Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Oncogenic BRAF-Mediated Melanoma Cell Invasion.

Cell reports·2016
Same author

Multiple response optimization of the coagulation process for upgrading the quality of effluent from municipal wastewater treatment plant.

Scientific reports·2016
Same author

Demonstration of flat-band image transmission in optically induced Lieb photonic lattices.

Optics letters·2016
Same author

The epithelial-mesenchymal transition phenotype of metastatic lymph nodes impacts the prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Oncotarget·2016
Same author

Observation of localized flat-band states in Kagome photonic lattices.

Optics express·2016
Same author

MMP1 promotes tumor growth and metastasis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Cancer letters·2016

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

A comparative intelligibility study of single-microphone noise reduction algorithms.

Yi Hu1, Philipos C Loizou

  • 1The University of Texas at Dallas, Department of Electrical Engineering, P.O. Box 830688, Richardson, Texas 75083, USA.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|October 12, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Most noise reduction algorithms do not improve speech intelligibility. Algorithms must enhance place and manner features to improve speech recognition, as quality does not correlate with intelligibility.

More Related Videos

An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners
07:52

An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners

Published on: March 13, 2026

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners
07:52

An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners

Published on: March 13, 2026

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Speech processing
  • Acoustics
  • Signal processing

Background:

  • Noise reduction algorithms aim to improve speech clarity.
  • Previous studies focused on overall quality, not intelligibility.
  • Speech intelligibility is crucial for effective communication.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the intelligibility of various noise reduction algorithms.
  • To determine if algorithms improve speech recognition features.
  • To identify key features for enhancing speech intelligibility.

Main Methods:

  • Corrupted IEEE sentences and consonants with four noise types at two SNR levels.
  • Processed audio using eight speech enhancement algorithms (spectral subtractive, subspace, statistical, Wiener-type).
  • Assessed intelligibility via normal-hearing listener identification and consonant confusion matrices.

Main Results:

  • No algorithm significantly improved speech intelligibility across most conditions.
  • No algorithm significantly improved the critical place feature score.
  • Algorithms excelling in quality did not necessarily improve intelligibility.

Conclusions:

  • Current noise reduction algorithms largely fail to enhance speech intelligibility.
  • Improving place and manner features is essential for better speech recognition.
  • Algorithm performance in quality does not predict intelligibility outcomes.