Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

In defense of the dust count technique.

L D Horowitz

    American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal
    |April 1, 1976
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) recommends a crystalline silica standard for OSHA, but it only uses mass respirable dust sampling. A dual standard, including dust count, is needed for better occupational safety.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    NIOSH criteria document on fibrous glass.

    Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association·1978
    Same author

    Silica criteria document.

    Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association·1976
    Same author

    Letter: Death related to argon gas exposure.

    American Industrial Hygiene Association journal·1976
    Same author

    Letter: Stoddards solvent and chemical nomenclature.

    American Industrial Hygiene Association journal·1975
    Same journal

    Barrier durability of latex and vinyl medical gloves in clinical settings.

    American Industrial Hygiene Association journal·2001
    Same journal

    Microwave emissions from police radar.

    American Industrial Hygiene Association journal·2000
    Same journal

    Assessment of magnetic field exposures for a mortality study at a uranium enrichment plant.

    American Industrial Hygiene Association journal·2000
    Same journal

    An assessment of occupational noise exposures in four construction trades.

    American Industrial Hygiene Association journal·2000
    Same journal

    Prediction of rectal temperature by the Questemp II personal heat strain monitor under low and moderate heat stress.

    American Industrial Hygiene Association journal·2000
    Same journal

    Indoor airborne fiber levels of MMVF in residential and commercial buildings.

    American Industrial Hygiene Association journal·2000
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Occupational Health and Safety
    • Industrial Hygiene
    • Toxicology

    Background:

    • Occupational exposure to crystalline silica poses significant health risks.
    • Current standards for crystalline silica exposure are based on limited methodologies.
    • The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has provided recommendations to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the adequacy of the current OSHA standard for occupational exposure to crystalline silica.
    • To advocate for the adoption of a dual standard for crystalline silica exposure monitoring.
    • To highlight the limitations of relying solely on the mass respirable method.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of NIOSH recommendations and existing OSHA standards.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of dust count studies and their correlation with health effects.
  • Comparison with the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) Threshold Limit Values (TLV) list.

    • Main Results:

    • NIOSH's recommendation to OSHA is based on dust count studies but mandates only the mass respirable sampling method.
    • The current OSHA standard's reliance on a single sampling method may not fully capture exposure risks.
    • A dual standard, incorporating both mass respirable and dust count methods, is proposed.

    Conclusions:

    • The current OSHA standard for crystalline silica exposure is insufficient due to its sole reliance on the mass respirable method.
    • Promulgating a dual standard, including the dust count method, is essential for comprehensive occupational health protection.
    • Adopting a dual standard, similar to the ACGIH-TLV list, would enhance worker safety against crystalline silica hazards.