Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026
08:01
Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach
Published on: August 24, 2018
Optimization of maxillary obturator thickness using a double-processing technique
Won-suck Oh1, Eleni D Roumanas
1Division of Prosthodontics, Department of Biologic & Materials Sciences, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, 1011 N. University, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. ohws@umich.edu
Summary
A novel double-processing technique for obturator prostheses significantly reduces weight and improves wall thickness control. This method enhances patient comfort and preserves remaining oral structures by minimizing stress on tissues.
Area of Science:
- Prosthodontics
- Biomaterials Engineering
- Oral Rehabilitation
Background:
- Prosthetic rehabilitation aims to preserve remaining oral structures.
- Heavy obturator prostheses can cause tissue damage, functional impairment, and discomfort.
- Current obturator hollowing techniques offer limited control over wall thickness.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce and evaluate a double-processing technique for obturator fabrication.
- To optimize obturator bulb weight and wall thickness for improved outcomes.
- To enhance the preservation of remaining oral tissues during prosthetic rehabilitation.
Main Methods:
- A novel double-processing technique for obturator fabrication was developed.
- The technique involves specific modifications during the processing stages.
- Wall thickness and overall bulb weight were key parameters assessed.
Main Results:
- The double-processing technique allows for precise control over obturator bulb wall thickness.
- Significant reduction in obturator bulb weight was achieved.
- Improved accessibility to the inner bulb facilitated better thickness management.
Conclusions:
- The double-processing technique offers a viable method for creating lighter and better-controlled obturators.
- This technique can lead to improved patient comfort and better preservation of residual oral structures.
- Further clinical evaluation is recommended to confirm long-term benefits.
