Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

QMEAN: A comprehensive scoring function for model quality assessment.

Pascal Benkert1, Silvio C E Tosatto, Dietmar Schomburg

  • 1Institute for Biochemistry, University of Cologne, 50674 Cologne, Germany.

Proteins
|October 13, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cohort profile: Swiss personalized health network cohort consortium.

European journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

Evolution of blood biomarkers reflective of brain tissue damage and inflammation in the perioperative course of intracerebral haemorrhage evacuation in a phase II proof-of-concept trial.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein as potential early indicators of osmotic brain stress in hyponatremia and its correction.

European journal of endocrinology·2026
Same author

On the state of protein function prediction: a report on the fourth CAFA challenge.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Diagnostic and prognostic value of blood neurofilament light chain in ischemic stroke: an individual patient data meta-analysis.

Journal of neurology·2026
Same author

Serum Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein and Retinal Neuronal Loss as Additive Prognostic Markers of Disability in Multiple Sclerosis.

Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation·2026

A new scoring function, QMEAN (Qualitative Model Energy ANalysis), improves protein structure prediction by effectively identifying the best models from large sets. Its novel torsion angle potential is key to recognizing native protein folds.

Area of Science:

  • Computational Biology
  • Structural Bioinformatics
  • Protein Science

Background:

  • Protein structure prediction generates numerous models, necessitating accurate scoring functions for selecting the best one.
  • Scoring functions are crucial components in protein structure prediction pipelines.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate QMEAN (Qualitative Model Energy ANalysis), a composite scoring function for protein model quality assessment.
  • To investigate different implementations and optimization strategies for QMEAN.

Main Methods:

  • QMEAN utilizes five structural descriptors: local geometry (three-residue torsion angle potential), long-range interactions (secondary structure-specific pairwise potential), solvation potential, and agreement terms for secondary structure and solvent accessibility.
  • The function was tested on standard decoy sets, molecular dynamics simulations, and CASP7 server predictions (22,420 models for 95 targets).

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • QMEAN demonstrated statistically significant improvements over five established model quality assessment programs.
  • It effectively identifies native structures and discriminates between good and bad models.
  • The three-residue torsion angle potential proved highly effective in recognizing native protein folds.

Conclusions:

  • QMEAN is a powerful composite scoring function for protein structure model quality assessment.
  • Its components, particularly the novel torsion angle potential, contribute to its superior performance.
  • QMEAN represents a significant advancement in protein structure prediction pipelines.