Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: P-value Method

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...

Critical Thinking I

Critical Thinking I

Critical thinking helps decision-making and allows nurses to recognize barriers to success and find solutions to possible issues. It helps to brainstorm and implement ideas to achieve goals. Critical thinking helps acknowledge and state workflow inefficiencies while improving management techniques. Nurses understand the value of critical thinking and look for fellow nurses with critical thinking skills to upgrade their professional standards. Critical thinking can advance a nurse's career with...

Decision Making: Traditional Method

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...

Heuristics

Heuristics

Heuristics are problem-solving strategies that use mental shortcuts to simplify decision-making. Unlike algorithms, which must be followed precisely to achieve a correct result, heuristics offer a general problem-solving framework. They save time and energy but can sometimes lead to less rational decisions.
People often rely on heuristics when faced with an overload of information, limited time, low importance of the decision, limited information, or when a heuristic readily comes to mind. For...

Decision Making

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...

Health Literacy

Health Literacy

Health literacy is an individual's or a community's capacity to comprehend, receive, read, and use relevant healthcare information and services. The World Health Organization (WHO, 2018) defines health literacy as the cognitive and social skills that determine the ability of individuals to gain access to, understand, and use information in ways that promote and maintain good health. As a result, the WHO helps individuals manage long-term health concerns, participate in preventative programs,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Trends in autoimmune rheumatic disease diagnoses before and after the COVID-19 pandemic in England: a population-based cohort study using OpenSAFELY.

The Lancet. Rheumatology·2026

Same author

Healthy Days at Home after Emergency General Surgery: Shifting Towards Long-Term Patient-Centered Outcomes for Older Adults.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons·2026

Same author

Dementia and Frailty Impact Postoperative Care Trajectories and Burden among Older Adults Undergoing Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026

Same author

Epidemiology of Traumatic Brain Injury in Medicare Beneficiaries over the Last Decade: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Health science reports·2026

Same author

State Expansions in Medicaid Financial Assistance for Low-Income Medicare Beneficiaries: Changes in Enrollment and Use.

Health services research·2026

Same author

Medicaid Retention After Transition to Medicare Among Adults With Expansion Coverage.

JAMA network open·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

The informed decisions toolbox: tools for knowledge transfer and performance improvement.

Thomas G Rundall¹, Peter F Martelli, Laura Arroyo

¹School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, USA. trundall@berkeley.edu

Journal of Healthcare Management / American College of Healthcare Executives

|October 16, 2007

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Healthcare managers can improve decision-making with the Informed Decisions Toolbox. This evidence-informed approach overcomes barriers like time constraints and reliance on anecdotal knowledge, enhancing organizational performance.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Healthcare Management
Evidence-Based Practice
Organizational Behavior

Background:

Growing demand for accountability and quality in healthcare necessitates evidence-informed managerial decision-making.
Healthcare managers face barriers including time pressures, limited access to evidence, and reliance on informal knowledge.
Existing decision-making processes often lack systematic approaches to evidence utilization.

Purpose of the Study:

To introduce the Informed Decisions Toolbox, a resource designed to aid healthcare managers in evidence-informed decision-making.
To provide practical tools for overcoming barriers to using evidence in healthcare management.
To outline leadership strategies for fostering an organizational culture that supports evidence-informed practices.

Main Methods:

Development of the Informed Decisions Toolbox, comprising tools for six key steps of evidence-informed decision-making.
Identification of barriers hindering managers' use of evidence in decision-making.
Proposal of four leadership-driven strategies to create a supportive organizational environment for evidence-informed practices.

Main Results:

The Informed Decisions Toolbox facilitates efficient application of evidence-informed decision-making steps.
Managers can overcome common barriers by utilizing structured tools and processes.
Leadership strategies promote knowledge transfer, a questioning culture, and research capabilities.

Conclusions:

The Informed Decisions Toolbox empowers healthcare managers to make more informed decisions.
Reduced reliance on anecdotal evidence and consultants leads to improved organizational performance.
Organizational support and the adoption of evidence-informed practices are crucial for healthcare quality and efficiency.