Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The conceptual and statistical relationship between modularity and morphological integration.

Philipp Mitteroecker1, Fred Bookstein

  • 1Department of Anthropology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. philipp.mitteroecker@univie.ac.at

Systematic Biology
|October 16, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Over the edge: Empirical evidence for the cliff-edge model of obstetric selection.

Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)·2026
Same author

Did energy costs of walking limit the evolution of a larger human birth canal?

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Genetic variance in reproductive timing contributes to trait evolvability.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2025
Same author

Convergent evolution in Afrotheria and non-afrotherians demonstrates high evolvability of the mammalian inner ear.

Nature communications·2024
Same author

Exploring Phylogenetic Signal in Multivariate Phenotypes by Maximizing Blomberg's K.

Systematic biology·2024
Same author

The cliff edge model of the evolution of schizophrenia: Mathematical, epidemiological, and genetic evidence.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2024
Same journal

Diversification dynamics in the global radiation of gobies.

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

Correction to: nQMaker: Estimating Time Nonreversible Amino Acid Substitution Models.

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

Phylogenomic challenges in polyploid-rich lineages: Insights from paralog processing and reticulation methods using the complex genus Packera (Asteraceae: Senecioneae).

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

An evolving view of phylogenetic biogeography.

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

Modeling Site-and-Branch-Heterogeneity with GFmix.

Systematic biology·2026
Same journal

Coalescent-based branch length estimation improves dating of species trees.

Systematic biology·2026
See all related articles

Understanding organismal form requires analyzing modularity and morphological integration. This study reveals how developmental factors influence trait correlations, offering new definitions for morphometric modules and integration patterns.

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Developmental biology
  • Morphometrics

Background:

  • Organismal form variation arises from local developmental processes.
  • Modularity studies often use experiments, while morphological integration focuses on correlated traits.
  • Classic modularity assumes high within-module and low between-module correlations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between developmental factors and trait correlations in modularity.
  • To redefine morphometric modules and explore methods for estimating integration patterns.
  • To assess the validity of classic modularity assumptions under varying developmental factor effects.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized simple path models to analyze trait covariances.
  • Investigated the impact of local developmental factors versus allometry.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Proposed a general definition for morphometric modules based on residual covariances.
  • Applied Wright-style factor analysis for pattern estimation.

    • Main Results:

    • The classic modularity assumption holds only when local developmental factors dominate over allometric effects.
    • Many traditional morphological integration approaches are valid only under near-isometric growth conditions.
    • A more general definition of morphometric modules involves non-zero within-module covariances after removing common factor effects.
    • Residual between-module covariances near zero support this generalized module definition.

    Conclusions:

    • Morphological integration and modularity are influenced by the relative strengths of local developmental factors and allometry.
    • A generalized definition of morphometric modules can be established even with non-experimental data.
    • Wright-style factor analysis offers a viable method for estimating integration patterns when modules are known.