Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo
Published on: February 6, 2015
Interpretation of treatment results with biological agents: is there a need for a new methodology?
1Department of Oncology, Royal Free and University College Medical School, UCL, London, UK. r.begent@ucl.ac.uk
Abstract:
The biological basis of cancer is progressively being demonstrated at a molecular level and it is possible to model the process of cancer and identify the points at which therapeutics can operate. With this knowledge of function, it is no longer satisfactory to assess response to therapy simply by change in dimensions of cancer. Genomic and proteomic analysis adds to conventional pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in preclinical models and at selected points in clinical development but advances in functional imaging make this a key tool for assessing response to therapy. Functional analyses of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images can add important information about tumour patho-physiology and positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission tomography (SPECT) imaging make it possible to study the distribution and therapeutic function of drugs. Together these advances will improve clinical practice and facilitate effective and safe drug development.
Insights
Molecular insights into cancer enable targeted therapeutics. Functional imaging, including CT, MRI, PET, and SPECT, offers superior assessment of treatment response beyond simple tumor size changes.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Cancer's biological basis is increasingly understood at the molecular level.
- Traditional assessment of cancer therapy response relies on dimensional changes, which is becoming insufficient.
- Genomic and proteomic analyses are valuable but functional imaging offers a key advancement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the importance of functional imaging in assessing cancer therapy response.
- To discuss how advanced imaging techniques can improve drug development.
- To emphasize the shift from purely dimensional assessments to functional evaluations of cancer treatment.
Main Methods:
- Utilizing functional analyses of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to understand tumor pathophysiology.
- Employing positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission tomography (SPECT) to study drug distribution and therapeutic function.
- Integrating genomic and proteomic data with imaging in preclinical and clinical settings.
Main Results:
- Functional imaging provides critical insights into tumor pathophysiology beyond anatomical changes.
- Advanced imaging techniques allow for the study of drug distribution and efficacy in vivo.
- These methods complement pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessments.
Conclusions:
- Functional imaging is essential for accurately assessing cancer therapy response.
- Advances in imaging facilitate more effective and safer cancer drug development.
- Integrating molecular understanding with functional imaging will enhance clinical practice.
Related Concept Videos
Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacodynamic Methods
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation
Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Drug Analysis Methods
