Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)01:14

Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)

6.4K
Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) is the combination of analytical techniques of gas chromatography and mass spectrometry in a single instrument for analyzing a mixture of compounds. The gas chromatograph separates the compounds in the mixture, and the mass spectrometer analyzes each compound separately to determine the molecular masses and molecular structures.
A gas chromatograph consists of a long, narrow capillary column with a polysiloxane coating on the inner wall....
6.4K
Gas Chromatography: Introduction01:13

Gas Chromatography: Introduction

3.5K
Gas chromatography (GC) is a technique for separating and analyzing volatile compounds in a sample. Its primary purpose is to identify and quantify components in complex mixtures, making it essential in fields such as environmental analysis, pharmaceuticals, and petrochemicals. GC is also called vapor-phase chromatography (VPC) or gas-liquid partition chromatography (GLPC).
In GC,  a sample is vaporized and mixed with an inert carrier gas (the mobile phase), which transports it through a...
3.5K
Chromatographic Methods: Terminology01:18

Chromatographic Methods: Terminology

3.6K
Chromatography is an analytical technique widely used in fields such as chemistry, biology, environmental science, and pharmaceuticals to separate the components of a mixture and identify substances between them. The process of chromatography is based on the interactions between two distinct phases: the stationary phase and the mobile phase. The stationary phase is fixed in place by a supporting material, while the mobile phase moves over it, carrying the solutes. As the mobile phase travels,...
3.6K
Silica Gel Column Chromatography: Overview01:10

Silica Gel Column Chromatography: Overview

3.3K
Silica gel column chromatography is a technique for separating compounds using a column packed with silica gel as the stationary phase. This method relies on differences in the polarity of compounds. Based on their polarities, compounds move between the stationary phase (silica gel) and the mobile phase (the solvent), forming discrete bands in the column.
Polar components tend to bind strongly to the silica gel, causing them to move slowly through the column. In contrast, nonpolar compounds...
3.3K
Gas Chromatography: Types of Columns and Stationary Phases01:17

Gas Chromatography: Types of Columns and Stationary Phases

2.1K
Gas chromatography (GC) relies on stationary phases to separate and analyze components in a sample. There are two main types of stationary phases: liquid and solid. Liquid stationary phases are non-volatile, thermally stable, and chemically inert liquids coated onto the column. Solid stationary phases are particles of adsorbent material, such as silica gel or molecular sieves.
For an analyte to remain on the column for a sufficient amount of time, it must exhibit some level of compatibility (or...
2.1K
Gas Chromatography: Sample Injection Systems01:08

Gas Chromatography: Sample Injection Systems

1.3K
In gas chromatography, the sample is introduced as a vapor plug into the carrier gas stream for high efficiency and resolution. A microsyringe injects the sample solution into a heated sample port, vaporizing it and mixing it with the carrier gas. This process is important to ensure the sample is properly prepared for analysis. Thermally sensitive samples can be injected directly into the column and volatilized by slowly increasing the column temperature.
Two primary injection methods are used...
1.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Influence of modulator injection width on comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography peak dimensions.

Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry·2022
Same author

The multi-mode modulator: A versatile fluidic device for two-dimensional gas chromatography.

Journal of chromatography. A·2017
Same author

Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with pattern modulation.

Journal of chromatography. A·2015
Same author

Analysis of siloxanes in hydrocarbon mixtures using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography.

Journal of chromatography. A·2014
Same author

Iterative trapping of gaseous volatile organic compounds in a capillary column.

Analytical chemistry·2014
Same author

High speed Deans switch for low duty cycle comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography.

Journal of chromatography. A·2013

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Chromatographic Fingerprinting by Template Matching for Data Collected by Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography
10:14

Chromatographic Fingerprinting by Template Matching for Data Collected by Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography

Published on: September 2, 2020

5.4K

Model for predicting comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography retention times.

John V Seeley1, Stacy K Seeley

  • 1Oakland University, Department of Chemistry, Rochester, MI 48309, USA. seeley@oakland.edu

Journal of Chromatography. A
|October 16, 2007
PubMed
Summary

A new model predicts solute retention in comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GCxGC) using standard single-column data. This method aids in selecting optimal stationary phases for GCxGC analysis.

More Related Videos

On-line Analysis of Nitrogen Containing Compounds in Complex Hydrocarbon Matrixes
07:49

On-line Analysis of Nitrogen Containing Compounds in Complex Hydrocarbon Matrixes

Published on: August 5, 2016

11.1K
Qualitative Characterization of the Aqueous Fraction from Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Algae Using 2D Gas Chromatography with Time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry
11:44

Qualitative Characterization of the Aqueous Fraction from Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Algae Using 2D Gas Chromatography with Time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry

Published on: March 6, 2016

9.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Chromatographic Fingerprinting by Template Matching for Data Collected by Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography
10:14

Chromatographic Fingerprinting by Template Matching for Data Collected by Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography

Published on: September 2, 2020

5.4K
On-line Analysis of Nitrogen Containing Compounds in Complex Hydrocarbon Matrixes
07:49

On-line Analysis of Nitrogen Containing Compounds in Complex Hydrocarbon Matrixes

Published on: August 5, 2016

11.1K
Qualitative Characterization of the Aqueous Fraction from Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Algae Using 2D Gas Chromatography with Time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry
11:44

Qualitative Characterization of the Aqueous Fraction from Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Algae Using 2D Gas Chromatography with Time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry

Published on: March 6, 2016

9.7K

Area of Science:

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Chromatography

Background:

  • Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GCxGC) offers enhanced separation power but predicting solute behavior can be complex.
  • Accurate prediction of solute retention is crucial for method development and stationary phase selection in GCxGC.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a predictive model for approximating relative solute retention in GCxGC using readily available one-dimensional retention data.
  • To assess the model's accuracy in predicting both primary and secondary retention orders for various volatile organic compounds (VOCs).

Main Methods:

  • The model converts one-dimensional retention times to retention indices.
  • These indices are combined to generate a retention diagram, approximating the GCxGC separation.
  • The model was tested using data from single-column GC-MS and valve-based GCxGC for 139 VOCs.

Main Results:

  • Retention diagrams showed excellent agreement with experimental GCxGC chromatograms for primary retention orders.
  • The model accurately predicted secondary retention orders for compounds with similar structures.
  • Less accurate predictions were observed for compounds with dissimilar structures, like alcohols and alkylbenzenes.

Conclusions:

  • Single-column retention time data can be effectively used to estimate solute retention in GCxGC separations.
  • The developed model provides a valuable tool for a priori screening of stationary phase combinations in GCxGC.
  • This approach simplifies GCxGC method development and optimization.