Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

EEG versus MEG localization accuracy: theory and experiment.

D Cohen1, B N Cuffin

  • 1Francis Bitter National Magnet Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute Technology, Cambridge 02139.

Brain Topography
|January 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Experimental tests of EEG source localization accuracy in realistically shaped head models.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2001
Same author

Effects of modeling errors and EEG measurement montage on source localization accuracy.

Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society·2001
Same author

Experimental tests of EEG source localization accuracy in spherical head models.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2001
Same author

Accuracy of EEG dipole source localization using implanted sources in the human brain.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·1999
Same author

EEG dipole source localization.

IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society·1998
Same author

Accuracy of electroencephalographic dipole localization of epileptiform activities associated with focal brain lesions.

Annals of neurology·1998

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG) show similar dipole source localization accuracy. MEG does not offer significant advantages over EEG for localization, but can complement EEG for source configuration analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Biophysics
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Accurate source localization of brain activity is crucial for understanding neural processes.
  • Electroencephalography (EEG) and Magnetoencephalography (MEG) are non-invasive techniques used for this purpose.
  • Comparing the localization accuracy of EEG and MEG is essential for optimizing their clinical and research applications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and compare theoretical, computational, and experimental findings on the localization accuracy of EEG and MEG.
  • To determine if MEG offers a significant advantage over EEG in localizing dipole sources.
  • To identify complementary roles for EEG and MEG in source analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Review of theoretical and computer modeling studies on EEG and MEG localization accuracy.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of experimental studies, including those using implanted dipoles in patients and phantom models.
  • Direct comparison of EEG and MEG localization errors in the same experimental setup.

    • Main Results:

    • Theoretical and modeling studies indicate that noise and head modeling errors similarly affect EEG and MEG localization.
    • Experimental studies show average localization errors of 20 mm for EEG and 2-10 mm for MEG in various phantoms and skulls.
    • Direct comparison in patients revealed average localization errors of 10 mm for EEG and 8 mm for MEG.

    Conclusions:

    • Both theoretical and experimental evidence suggest MEG does not offer a significant advantage over EEG for dipole source localization.
    • MEG's ability to suppress signals from radial sources makes it a valuable complement to EEG for distinguishing source configurations.
    • The findings support the combined use of EEG and MEG to leverage their respective strengths in neuroimaging.