Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Institutional academic industry relationships.

Eric G Campbell1, Joel S Weissman, Susan Ehringhaus

  • 1Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA. ecampbell@partners.org

JAMA
|October 18, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Safety and antitumour activity of ipatasertib combined with endocrine therapy and a CDK4/6 inhibitor in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (TAKTIC): a single-centre, open-label, phase 1b trial.

The Lancet. Oncology·2026
Same author

Response to Open Peer Commentaries: "Principlistic Equality: The Relative Importance of the Four Principles Among Primary and Urgent Care Clinicians".

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same author

Mailed Outreach for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Community Health Centers: The CARES Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA internal medicine·2026
Same author

Goal Concordance in the Advancing Symptom Alleviation with Palliative Treatment Clinical Trial of a Nurse and Social Worker Palliative Telecare Team Intervention.

Journal of palliative medicine·2026
Same author

"Black box" artificial intelligence for mortality prediction: a mixed-methods study of palliative care team, patient, and caregiver perspectives.

Annals of palliative medicine·2026
Same author

<i>Letter:</i> Measuring Goal Concordance Using a Likert Scale in the ADAPT Clinical Trial.

Journal of palliative medicine·2026
Same journal

Deaths Caused by Law Enforcement in the US.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

Hepatitis B.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

Lung Transplant for Refractory Lung-Limited Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

AI vs Poetry in Medicine.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

Rates of Precipitated Withdrawal in a Trial of ED-Initiated Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorder-Reply.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

New Lungs for Lung Cancer-Perils and Promises.

JAMA·2026
See all related articles

Academic-industry relationships are common in medical schools, with 60% of department chairs having personal ties. These prevalent relationships highlight the need for active disclosure and management to maintain research integrity.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Research
  • Academic-Industry Partnerships
  • Conflict of Interest Management

Background:

  • Institutional academic-industry relationships can create conflicts of interest.
  • Empirical data on managing these relationships are lacking.
  • Policies and practices for managing these relationships require evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To survey department chairs nationally on academic-industry relationships.
  • To assess the nature, extent, and consequences of these relationships.
  • To inform institutional policy development for managing conflicts of interest.

Main Methods:

  • National survey of department chairs in 125 accredited allopathic medical schools and 15 largest independent teaching hospitals.
  • Data collected between February 2006 and October 2006.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Survey focused on types of relationships with industry.
  • Main Results:

    • 67% response rate from 459 department chairs.
    • 60% of chairs had personal relationships with industry (consulting, speaking, board roles).
    • Clinical departments received more resources (equipment, funding, training support) than nonclinical departments.

    Conclusions:

    • Institutional academic-industry relationships are highly prevalent.
    • Active disclosure and management of these relationships are essential.
    • Potential negative impacts on independent research necessitate careful oversight.