Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging.

Elizabeth S Burnside1, Timothy J Hall, Amy M Sommer

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin Medical School, E3/311 Clinical Science Center, Madison, WI 53792-3252, USA. eburnside@uwhealth.org

Radiology
|October 18, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Thermal and imaging effects of Feraheme in MR-guided focused ultrasound: a phantom study.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same author

Self-supervised Deep Learning for Denoising in Ultrasound Microvascular Imaging.

Biomedical signal processing and control·2026
Same author

Plantar Needle-pricking for Early Lower-Limb Recovery After Stroke via the Nociceptive Withdrawal Reflex: Assessor-Blinded Randomized Trial.

Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE·2026
Same author

Neutrophil extracellular Trap-related genes in NAFLD: Biomarkers and therapeutic targets.

Clinical and experimental medicine·2026
Same author

Detecting Uniformity Artifacts in Ultrasound Transducers: Insights from Clinical Median Images and Deep Learning for Automatic Detection.

Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine·2026
Same author

Plethysmography compared to ultrasound for the evaluation of chronic venous insufficiency.

Vascular medicine (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Erratum for: Prediction of Lobar Emphysema Progression with a CT-Based Foundational Model.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Erratum for: Associations of MRI-derived Paraspinal IMAT and LMM with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: Results from a German Cohort.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Erratum for: Blue Rubber Bleb Nevus Syndrome.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Redefining the Clinical Role of MRI in Endometrial Cancer Staging.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

To Ablate or Not to Ablate: The Colorectal Liver Metastasis Question.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

The Limits of Radiologic Categorization in Pulmonary Nonsolid Nodules.

Radiology·2026
See all related articles

Ultrasonographic (US) strain imaging improves the accuracy of differentiating benign from malignant breast masses. Image quality and reader variability impact performance, but strain imaging enhances diagnostic capabilities.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Distinguishing benign from malignant breast masses is crucial for patient management.
  • Conventional B-mode ultrasonography has limitations in characterizing solid breast lesions.
  • Advanced imaging techniques are needed to improve diagnostic accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To prospectively evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasonographic (US) strain imaging.
  • To determine the sensitivity and specificity of US strain imaging in differentiating benign and malignant solid breast masses.
  • To compare US strain imaging with conventional B-mode US for breast mass characterization.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective evaluation of 403 breast masses using US strain imaging.
  • Three blinded observers assessed B-mode and strain images, providing malignancy probability estimates.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to calculate diagnostic performance metrics.

    • Main Results:

    • US strain imaging demonstrated a higher area under the ROC curve (0.903) compared to B-mode US alone (0.876).
    • Strain imaging significantly improved specificity (0.257 vs 0.132) while maintaining high sensitivity (0.993 vs 0.987).
    • Significant interobserver variability was noted, with image quality correlating with observer performance.

    Conclusions:

    • US strain imaging enhances the classification of solid breast masses.
    • Interobserver variability and image quality are critical factors influencing the effectiveness of US strain imaging.
    • Further optimization is needed to standardize strain imaging interpretation for improved clinical application.