Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Inducing Meningococcal Meningitis Serogroup C in Mice via Intracisternal Delivery
Published on: November 5, 2019
Third generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for treating acute bacterial meningitis
1All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Neurosciences Center, Room No. 704, AIIMS, New Delhi, India, 11002. drkameshwarprasad@yahoo.co.in
Background:
Antibiotic therapy for suspected acute bacterial meningitis (ABM) needs to be started immediately, even before the results of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture and antibiotic sensitivity are available. Immediate commencement of effective treatment using the intravenous route may reduce death and disability. Although bacterial meningitis guidelines advise the use of third generation cephalosporins, these drugs are often not available in hospitals in low income countries.
Objectives:
The objective of this review was to compare the effectiveness and safety of third generation cephalosporins and conventional treatment with penicillin or ampicillin-chloramphenicol in patients with community-acquired ABM.
Search Strategy:
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 1) which contains the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections Group Trials Register, MEDLINE (January 1966 to March 2007), and EMBASE (January 1974 to March 2007). We also searched the reference list of review articles and book chapters, and contacted experts for any unpublished trials.
Selection Criteria:
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ceftriaxone or cefotaxime with conventional antibiotics as empirical therapy for acute bacterial meningitis.
Data Collection And Analysis:
Two review authors independently applied the study selection criteria, assessed methodological quality, and extracted data.
Main Results:
Nineteen trials that involved 1496 patients were included in the analysis. There was no heterogeneity of results among the studies in any outcome except diarrhoea. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the risk of death (risk difference (RD) 0%; 95% confidence interval (CI) -3% to 2%), risk of deafness (RD -4%; 95% CI -9% to 1%), or risk of treatment failure (RD -1%; 95% CI -4% to 2%). However, there were significantly decreased risks of culture positivity of CSF after 10 to 48 hours (RD -6%; 95% CI -11% to 0%) and statistically significant increases in the risk of diarrhoea between the groups (RD 8%; 95% CI 3% to 13%) with the third generation cephalosporins. The risk of neutropaenia and skin rash were not significantly different between the two groups. However, all the studies were conducted in the 1980s except three, which were reported in 1993, 1996, and 2005.
Authors' Conclusions:
The review shows no clinically important difference between ceftriaxone or cefotaxime and conventional antibiotics. In situations where availability or affordability is an issue, third generation cephalosporins, ampicillin-chloramphenicol combination, or chloramphenicol alone may be used as alternatives. The antimicrobial resistance pattern against various antibiotics needs to be closely monitored in low to middle income countries as well as high income countries.
Insights
Third generation cephalosporins show no significant difference in effectiveness or safety compared to conventional antibiotics for acute bacterial meningitis (ABM). This finding is crucial for treatment decisions, especially in low-resource settings.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Pharmacology
- Evidence-Based Medicine
Background:
- Immediate antibiotic therapy is vital for suspected acute bacterial meningitis (ABM) before definitive culture results.
- Guidelines recommend third-generation cephalosporins, but availability is limited in low-income countries.
- Conventional treatments include penicillin or ampicillin-chloramphenicol.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness and safety of third-generation cephalosporins versus conventional antibiotics for community-acquired ABM.
- To evaluate outcomes such as mortality, deafness, and treatment failure.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
- Searched multiple databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE) and contacted experts.
- Included 19 trials involving 1496 patients, assessing methodological quality and extracting data.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant differences in mortality, deafness, or treatment failure between treatment groups.
- Third-generation cephalosporins showed a trend towards decreased CSF positivity and increased diarrhea.
- Most studies were from the 1980s, with a few more recent reports.
Conclusions:
- No clinically significant difference between third-generation cephalosporins and conventional antibiotics for ABM.
- Conventional options like ampicillin-chloramphenicol or chloramphenicol alone may be suitable where third-generation cephalosporins are unavailable or unaffordable.
- Monitoring antimicrobial resistance patterns is essential globally.
Related Concept Videos
Bacterial Meningitis I: Introduction
Bacterial Meningitis
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Inhibitors of Gram-positive Cell Wall Synthesis
Bacterial Meningitis II: Pathophysiology
Viral Meningitis