Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026
Method of Isolated Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion in a Rat Model: Lessons Learned from Developing a Rat EVLP Program
Published on: February 25, 2015
Pumpless extracorporeal lung assist for protective mechanical ventilation in experimental lung injury
Rolf Dembinski1, Nadine Hochhausen, Sandra Terbeck
1Department of Surgical Intensive Care Medicine, and Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Aachen, Aachen, Germany. rolf.dembinski@post.rwth-aachen.de
Objective:
To test the hypothesis that ventilation with 3 mL/kg tidal volume combined with extracorporeal CO2 removal by arteriovenous interventional lung assist reduces ventilator-associated organ injury in experimental acute lung injury when compared with ventilation with 6 mL/kg tidal volume without interventional lung assist.
Design:
Prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
Setting:
A university research laboratory.
Subjects:
A total of 14 pigs weighing 46 +/- 4 kg (mean +/- sd).
Interventions:
Acute lung injury was induced by repeated lung lavages until Pao2 was <100 mm Hg, with Fio2 of 1.0 and positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cm H2O, for 1 hr without additional lavages. Animals were randomized to an interventional group with a tidal volume of 3 mL/kg with interventional lung assist (n = 7) or to a control group with a tidal volume of 6 mL/kg without interventional lung assist (n = 7) for 24 hrs. Organ function in vivo was determined by laboratory analyses, including calculations of pulmonary ventilation/perfusion distribution. Histologic assessment of organ injury was performed post mortem after 24 hrs.
Measurements And Main Results:
In both groups, gas exchange improved in the course of the study (p < .05). However, in contrast to control animals, animals with lower tidal volumes and interventional lung assist had severe ventilation/perfusion mismatch, as indicated by increased perfusion to lung areas with a low ventilation/perfusion ratio (p < .05). Other variables of organ function in vivo and results of histologic examination post mortem did not reveal any statistical difference between groups.
Conclusions:
Combined ventilation with lower tidal volumes and extracorporeal CO2 removal as compared with traditional low tidal volumes without extracorporeal CO2 removal is not associated with differences in organ injury. Obviously, ventilation with tidal volumes of <6 mL/kg may cause pulmonary de-recruitment when positive end-expiratory pressure is not adequately increased.
