Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Lessons learned from nuclear transfer (cloning).

C L Keefer1

  • 1Department of Animal & Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA. ckeefer@umd.edu

Theriogenology
|October 20, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Time within reproductive season, but not age or inbreeding coefficient, affects seminal and sperm quality in the whooping crane (Grus americana).

Reproduction, fertility, and development·2015
Same author

Molecular markers of spermatogonial stem cells in the domestic cat.

Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene·2013
Same author

Challenges and prospects for the establishment of embryonic stem cell lines of domesticated ungulates.

Animal reproduction science·2006
Same author

State of the art in the production of transgenic goats.

Reproduction, fertility, and development·2004
Same author

Production of bioproducts through the use of transgenic animal models.

Animal reproduction science·2004
Same author

Prepubertal propagation of transgenic cloned goats by laparoscopic ovum pick-up and in vitro embryo production.

Cloning and stem cells·2004
Same journal

Telomere regulation of mitochondria in porcine parthenogenetic embryos.

Theriogenology·2026
Same journal

Interaction of ARA54 with androgen receptor in mediating testosterone-dependent regulation of caput epididymal GPX5 expression in mice.

Theriogenology·2026
Same journal

Associations of sow characteristics, boar semen traits, and seminal plasma metabolomics with fertility outcomes following artificial insemination.

Theriogenology·2026
Same journal

Association of 17β-HSD3 with steroidogenesis-related gene expression and primordial germ cell development in ducks.

Theriogenology·2026
Same journal

Farrerol improves the maturation quality of porcine oocytes derived from small follicles associated with RAD51-related DNA repair responses.

Theriogenology·2026
Same journal

Environmentally relevant polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon mixtures disrupt ovarian endocrine function in the domestic hen (Gallus gallus domesticus).

Theriogenology·2026
See all related articles

Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) successfully reprograms somatic cell nuclei for live offspring. Improving SCNT efficiency requires addressing biological and technical challenges through comparative species studies.

Area of Science:

  • Reproductive biology
  • Developmental biology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) is a technique used to create genetically identical offspring.
  • SCNT involves transferring a somatic cell nucleus into an enucleated oocyte.
  • This process has been successful across numerous species, enabling embryonic development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the challenges and efficiencies of somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT).
  • To explore how comparative studies between different species can enhance SCNT.
  • To uncover fundamental principles of embryonic development through SCNT research.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) across various species.
  • Comparative analysis of SCNT efficiencies and challenges in livestock versus laboratory animals.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Identification of known and unknown biological and technical factors affecting SCNT success.

    • Main Results:

    • SCNT has been achieved in a wide range of species, demonstrating nuclear reprogramming.
    • The overall efficiency of SCNT remains low, indicating significant biological and technical hurdles.
    • Variations in SCNT success rates exist between different species groups.

    Conclusions:

    • Further research into SCNT, particularly comparative studies, is crucial for improving efficiency.
    • Understanding species-specific differences in SCNT can reveal core developmental mechanisms.
    • Addressing the challenges in SCNT can advance both reproductive technologies and developmental biology.