Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

What can we learn about hearing aids from cochlear implants?

R S Tyler1

  • 1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City.

Ear and Hearing
|December 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Recent Advances in Tinnitus.

American journal of audiology·2015
Same author

Cochlear Implants and the Deaf Culture.

American journal of audiology·2015
Same author

Response to Pool and Rose.

American journal of audiology·2015
Same author

Pre-lingually deaf children can perform as well as post-lingually deaf adults using cochlear implants.

Cochlear implants international·2008
Same author

A preliminary investigation comparing one and eight channels at fast and slow rates on music appraisal in adults with cochlear implants.

Cochlear implants international·2008
Same author

7-year speech perception results and the effects of age, residual hearing and preimplant speech perception in prelingually deaf children using the Nucleus and Clarion cochlear implants.

Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology·2002
Same journal

Community-Informed Adaptation of a School-Based Hearing Health Intervention: Formative Evaluation for an Effectiveness-Implementation Trial.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Hearing Difficulty, Health Literacy, and Poorer Health Among Adults in the United States: 2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Study.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Cultural Differences in Listening Environments Between Hispanic and White Non-Hispanic Cochlear Implant Users.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Detection of Inner Ear Malformations Based on Simple Anatomical Measurements: A Model Approach.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Avoiding Cisplatin-Related Hearing Loss, Including Implementing Sodium Thiosulfate as Otoprotectant Into Daily Pediatric Clinical Practice: Proceedings Based on Evidence and Expert Opinion From the Ototoxicity Taskforce of the SIOP Supportive Care Network.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same journal

Quantifying Miscommunications in Triadic Conversations: Effects of Hearing Impairment, Hearing Aids, and Background Noise.

Ear and hearing·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Cochlear implants significantly aid profoundly hearing-impaired patients, offering varied benefits in word recognition and sentence understanding. These devices show promise for both adults and children, though children may need more time to adapt.

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Rehabilitation Medicine

Background:

  • Profound hearing impairment presents significant challenges in communication and daily life.
  • Cochlear implants represent a major advancement in restoring auditory function for individuals with severe to profound hearing loss.
  • Previous research indicates a spectrum of outcomes for cochlear implant users, necessitating further investigation into factors influencing performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of multichannel cochlear implants in postlingually deafened adults.
  • To assess the benefits of cochlear implants for prelingually deafened children.
  • To derive insights from cochlear implant experience applicable to future hearing aid development.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of performance data from 63 postlingually deaf adult patients using Nucleus and Inerad multichannel cochlear implants.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessment of word recognition, lipreading enhancement, and sentence comprehension.
  • Comparative observation of outcomes in prelingually deaf children versus postlingually deaf individuals.

    • Main Results:

    • Postlingually deaf adults demonstrated a wide range of performance, with word recognition scores from 0-62%, lipreading enhancement from 0-98%, and sentence understanding from 0-98%.
    • Prelingually deaf children benefit from cochlear implants but require a longer adaptation period compared to postlingually deafened individuals.
    • Key observations for hearing aid development include the necessity of field trials, preserving frequency resolution, extended fitting periods, individualized fitting algorithms, patient acceptance of larger devices for significant benefit, and willingness to adopt expensive hearing aids.

    Conclusions:

    • Multichannel cochlear implants offer substantial, albeit variable, benefits for postlingually deafened adults.
    • While beneficial for prelingually deaf children, cochlear implant rehabilitation requires extended timelines.
    • Cochlear implant development offers valuable lessons for advancing sophisticated hearing aid technology, emphasizing user-centered design and robust clinical validation.