Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Modeling Posthemorrhagic Hydrocephalus of Prematurity in Rats
Published on: March 28, 2025
Delayed endoscopic intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) removal and endoscopic third ventriculostomy may not prevent
T Nishikawa1, N Takehira, A Matsumoto
1Department of Neurosurgery, Saiseikai-Izuo Hospital, Osaka, Japan. knmhf949@ybb.ne.jp
Insights
Delayed endoscopic treatment for intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) may not prevent hydrocephalus if the removal of IVH is insufficient. Further research is needed to optimize endoscopic interventions for better outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Neurology
- Medical Technology
Background:
- Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) often leads to communicating hydrocephalus.
- Effective management of IVH is crucial to prevent secondary complications like hydrocephalus.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if delayed endoscopic treatment of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) can prevent communicating hydrocephalus.
- To compare outcomes between external ventricular drainage (EVD) alone and endoscopic interventions for IVH.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 9 patients with IVH secondary to intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).
- Patients received either EVD alone or endoscopic IVH removal with endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV).
- Treatment timing and duration of EVD were recorded, along with the need for shunt placement.
Main Results:
- No patients treated with EVD alone required shunt placement.
- Two out of four patients undergoing endoscopic treatment required shunt placement.
- EVD duration varied significantly among patients, with some requiring it until death.
Conclusions:
- Delayed endoscopic IVH removal and ETV may not reliably prevent communicating hydrocephalus.
- Insufficient IVH removal during endoscopic procedures could be a contributing factor.
- External ventricular drainage alone, in this series, did not necessitate shunt placement.
Object:
The aim of this study was to investigate whether delayed endoscopic treatment of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) can prevent consecutive communicating hydrocephalus.
Methods:
A retrospective series of 9 patients with IVH caused by intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) who were treated with external ventricular drainage (EVD) or endoscopic IVH removal and endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) was studied in our institute. Five of these patients who had previously been treated a year before in our institute with the installation of a flexible endoscope, were treated with EVD alone on admission. Of the other patients, three received endoscopic removal of IVH and ETV and, after a one week, EVD placement, and the final patient underwent endoscopic IVH removal and ETV one day after onset.
Results:
Three of the patients treated with EVD alone were fitted with the EVD for 8, 11 and 16 days, and 2 patients were fitted with the EVD until they died. No patients treated with EVD alone required shunt placement. In contrast, of the 4 patients treated endoscopically, EVD was placed totally for 0, 6, 9, and 22 days for each patient, among whom 2 patients required shunt placement.
Conclusions:
Delayed endoscopic IVH removal and ETV might not prevent consecutive communicating hydrocephalus if IVH removal was insufficient.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Increased Intracranial Pressure l: Introduction
Increased Intracranial Pressure ll: Pathophysiology
Cerebral Edema ll: Pathophysiology
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
