Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026
11:51
Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
Published on: March 2, 2011
Should I stay or should I go?
1MedAccount.
Journal of the Irish Dental Association
|October 24, 2007
Summary
Withdrawing from the Dental Treatment Support Scheme (DTSS) involves more than just financial considerations. Dentists must evaluate patient duty of care, facility upgrades, and competitor reactions before making an informed practice decision.
Area of Science:
- Dental Practice Management
- Healthcare Economics
- Patient Care Ethics
Background:
- The decision to withdraw from the Dental Treatment Support Scheme (DTSS) presents complex challenges for dental practices.
- Financial implications are often the primary driver, but other critical factors require careful consideration.
Purpose of the Study:
- To outline the multifaceted considerations beyond financial aspects when a dental practice contemplates withdrawing from the DTSS.
- To guide dentists in making an informed, fact-based decision impacting their practice and patient care.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative analysis of practice management decision-making factors.
- Review of ethical obligations and operational requirements for dental practices.
- Competitive analysis framework for dental service provision.
Main Results:
- Withdrawal decisions necessitate evaluating the dentist's duty of care to patients.
- Potential needs for practice facility upgrades must be assessed.
- Anticipating the competitive response from nearby dental practices is crucial.
Conclusions:
- The decision to withdraw from the DTSS is highly individualized, requiring thorough due diligence.
- Practices should base their decision on comprehensive data and impact assessments, not assumptions.
- A holistic approach considering financial, ethical, operational, and competitive factors ensures optimal practice strategy.
Related Concept Videos
02:06Social Exchange Theory
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
01:26Social Exchange Theory
As formulated by John Thibaut and Harold Kelley, Social Exchange Theory explains human relationships as economic-like exchanges that maximize rewards and minimize costs. This theory suggests that individuals engage in relationships to gain benefits and reduce burdens, similar to economic transactions. It has been widely applied to various types of relationships, including romantic, professional, and social interactions.Rewards and Costs in RelationshipsRelationship rewards include emotional...
02:14Leaving Groups
The nature of leaving groups strongly influences the outcome of a nucleophilic substitution reaction.
In general, in a nucleophilic substitution reaction, a nucleophile displaces a functional group, called the leaving group, from the substrate to give a substituted product. A leaving group departs the substrate molecule through heterolytic cleavage, taking the pair of electrons with it to become a relatively stable weak base in the form of an anion or a neutral molecule.
In a nucleophilic...
In general, in a nucleophilic substitution reaction, a nucleophile displaces a functional group, called the leaving group, from the substrate to give a substituted product. A leaving group departs the substrate molecule through heterolytic cleavage, taking the pair of electrons with it to become a relatively stable weak base in the form of an anion or a neutral molecule.
In a nucleophilic...
01:28Ending Relationships
The dissolution of intimate relationships presents complex emotional and psychological challenges, particularly when emotional bonds are strong, the relationship is long-standing, and perceived alternatives are limited. This distress often intensifies in romantic breakups, where the initiator may experience greater turmoil than the rejected partner. Contributing factors include residual attachment, guilt over causing pain, and uncertainty about how to manage the situation. The stress is further...
01:14Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance
Avoidance-avoidance conflict refers to a psychological situation where a person must choose between two or more unpleasant alternatives. These conflicts are particularly stressful because neither option is desirable. This dilemma is often expressed in sayings like "caught between a rock and a hard place" or "between the devil and the deep blue sea." For instance, individuals who fear dental procedures may find themselves torn between enduring a painful toothache or facing the anxiety of...
01:38Cognitive Dissonance
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...