Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Analysis of Protein Folding, Transport, and Degradation in Living Cells by Radioactive Pulse Chase
Published on: February 12, 2019
Positional dependence of non-native polar mutations on folding of CFTR helical hairpins
Hania Wehbi1, Geneviève Gasmi-Seabrook, Mei Y Choi
1Division of Molecular Structure and Function, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Department of Biochemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1A8.
Abstract:
Mutations of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) cause CF disease by altering the biosynthesis, maturation, folding and ion conductance of this protein. Our laboratory has focused on expression and structural analysis of the CFTR transmembrane (TM) domains using two-TM segments (i.e., helix-loop-helix constructs) which we term 'helical hairpins'; these represent the minimal model of tertiary contacts between two helices in a membrane. Previous studies on a library of TM3/4 hairpins of the first CFTR TM domain suggested that introduction of non-native polar residues into TM4 can compromise CFTR function through side chain-side chain H-bonding interactions with native Q207 in TM3 [Choi, M. Y., Cardarelli, L., Therien, A. G., and Deber, C. M. Non-native interhelical hydrogen bonds in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator domain modulated by polar mutations, Biochemistry 43 (2004) 8077-8083]. In the present work, we combine gel shift assays with a series of NMR experiments for comparative structural characterization of the wild type TM3/4 hairpin and its mutants V232D, I231D, Q207N/V232E. Over 95% of the backbone resonances of a 15N,13C-labelled V232D-TM3/4 construct in the membrane-mimetic environment of perfluorooctanoate (PFO) micelles were successfully assigned, and the presence and boundaries of helical segments within TM3 and TM4 were defined under these conditions. Comparative analysis of 15N and 1H chemical shift variations among HSQC spectra of WT-, V232D-, I231D- and Q207N/V232E-TM3/4 indicated that hairpin conformations vary with the position of a polar mutation (i.e., V232D and I231D vs. WT), but remain similar when hairpins with identically-positioned polar partners are compared (i.e., V232D vs. Q207N-V232E). The overall findings suggest that a polar mutation in a TM helix can potentially distort native interfacial packing determinants in membrane proteins such as CFTR, with consequences that may lead to disease.
More Related Videos
07:08Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues
Published on: July 14, 2015
10:31Residue-Specific Exchange of Proline by Proline Analogs in Fluorescent Proteins: How "Molecular Surgery" of the Backbone Affects Folding and Stability
Published on: February 3, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Protein Folding
Protein Structure Is Critical to Its Biological Function
Proteins perform a wide range of biological functions such as catalyzing chemical reactions, providing...
Protein Folding
Protein Folding
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...
Molecular Chaperones and Protein Folding
The...
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...