Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026

12:10
Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
Published on: March 4, 2022
Ravens judge competitors through experience with play caching.
Thomas Bugnyar1, Christine Schwab, Christian Schloegl
1Konrad Lorenz Forschungsstelle, Department Behavioral Biology, University of Vienna, 4645 Grünau 11, Austria. thomas.bugnyar@univie.ac.at
Current Biology : CB
|October 24, 2007
Summary
Ravens learn to assess competitors by observing their caching behavior with inedible items. They then use this knowledge to protect their food caches from potential pilferers.
Area of Science:
- Animal Behavior
- Cognitive Ecology
- Avian Cognition
Background:
- Complex social behavior relies on judging others as cooperators or competitors.
- Play serves as a mechanism for assessing dispositions in mammals, but its role in birds is less understood.
- Food-caching corvids demonstrate advanced social cognition, rivaling primates in competitive scenarios.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if ravens (Corvus corax) can assess the competitive strategies of unfamiliar individuals.
- To determine if ravens apply learned social judgments to subsequent food-caching behavior.
- To explore the role of playful object caching in evaluating others' pilfering tendencies.
Main Methods:
- Ravens were exposed to two human experimenters with differing behaviors towards cached inedible items (pilferer vs. onlooker).
- Researchers observed changes in the location of subsequent object caches made by the ravens.
- The study assessed how ravens modified their food-caching behavior in response to these interactions.
Main Results:
- Ravens learned to differentiate between a pilfering and a non-pilfering human based on interactions with inedible items.
- Ravens adjusted their object caching locations, moving them away from or towards the humans.
- Crucially, ravens selectively protected food caches from the competitive (pilfering) human, demonstrating applied social knowledge.
Conclusions:
- Ravens can rapidly assess the competitive strategies of unfamiliar individuals through social interactions.
- Knowledge gained from caching inedible items influences subsequent caching behavior with valuable food resources.
- Playful object caching in a social context aids ravens in evaluating the pilfering dispositions of others.
Related Concept Videos
Robbers Cave
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension could be...
Competition
When organisms require the same limited resources within an environment, they may have to compete for them. Competition is a net-negative interaction. Even if two competing individuals or populations do not interact directly, the overall fitness of both competitors is lowered as a result of not having full access to the limited resource.Intraspecific competition, which occurs between individuals of the same species, serves as a natural mechanism for regulating population size. Too much...
Comparison Tests
An infinite series composed of positive terms may either approach a finite value or increase without bound. Determining which outcome occurs is a central task in calculus, and comparison tests provide structured methods for making this determination. Rather than evaluating a series directly, these tests relate it to another series whose behavior is already known, allowing conclusions to be drawn through logical comparison.The direct comparison test applies to series with positive terms. If each...
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II
The Wald-Wolfowitz runs test, commonly referred to as the runs test, is a nonparametric test used to assess the randomness of ordered data. The test evaluates the number of runs, which are consecutive sequences of similar elements within the data. If the number of runs is significantly higher or lower than expected, the data is considered non-random, indicating a detectable pattern or structure.
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and 0s. In...
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and 0s. In...