Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A framework for evaluating eHealth research.

Kathryn H Dansky1, Debbe Thompson, Tammy Sanner

  • 1The Pennsylvania State University, 114 Henderson Building, University Park, PA 16802, USA.

Evaluation and Program Planning
|October 24, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Digital Diabetes Prevention Program for Hispanic Adolescents (Fit24+): Protocol for a Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.

JMIR research protocols·2026
Same author

Community Participatory Co-Design and Development of a Digital Diabetes Prevention Education Program for Hispanic Families With Obesity: Mixed Methods Study.

JMIR formative research·2026
Same author

Modern Home Cooking Practices, the Role of New Media, and Implications for Culinary Medicine: A Qualitative Study Among Mothers With Low Income.

American journal of lifestyle medicine·2026
Same author

The feasibility of passively tracking children's TV viewing and mobile device use in naturalistic settings.

Behaviour & information technology·2025
Same author

A pragmatic guide to data integration for pediatric researchers: the nuts and bolts of mixed methods analysis.

Journal of pediatric psychology·2025
Same author

To Pause With a Cliffhanger or a Temporary Closure? The Differential Impact of Serial Versus Episodic Narratives on Children's Physical Activity Behaviors.

Communication research·2025
Same journal

Terms of whose reference? Commissioning, power, and the distribution of evaluative learning in development.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

Proposing an identity-in-context framework for culturally responsive evaluation.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

The Participatory Institutional Capacity Assessment and Learning (PICAL) index, its adaptation in the democratic republic of the congo, and lessons learned.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

Decolonizing evaluation education in South Africa: A reflective case study of master's curriculum reform through a Made-in-Africa evaluation lens.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

Program evaluation plan assessing African American male achievement at predominantly white institutions: New Jersey education opportunity fund.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

Cardiovascular screening in homeless outreach: An operationally-ethical protocol.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
See all related articles

eHealth adoption is rapidly growing, but effective evaluation faces significant challenges. A holistic, flexible framework integrating design, technology, environment, and logistics is crucial for successful eHealth research and implementation.

Area of Science:

  • Health Informatics
  • Digital Health
  • Healthcare Technology Evaluation

Background:

  • The healthcare sector is experiencing a surge in consumer-oriented technologies, leading to widespread adoption of eHealth solutions across diverse populations.
  • Despite the growing use of eHealth, significant challenges in its implementation and evaluation are emerging, compounded by rapid technological advancements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the multifaceted challenges in implementing and evaluating eHealth interventions.
  • To propose a holistic framework for designing and conducting eHealth research projects and understanding eHealth interventions.

Main Methods:

  • The study identifies and discusses four critical dimensions for eHealth evaluation: design/methodology, technology-specific challenges, environmental factors, and logistical/administrative concerns.

Related Experiment Videos

  • A conceptual framework is presented, integrating these four dimensions to provide a comprehensive approach to eHealth evaluation.

    • Main Results:

    • The integration of design, technology, environmental, and logistical dimensions is essential for a holistic evaluation of eHealth.
    • The proposed framework is designed to be adaptable to various end-users, including healthcare organizations, businesses, community groups, and individuals.

    Conclusions:

    • A flexible, integrated framework is necessary to navigate the complexities of eHealth evaluation.
    • This approach ensures a comprehensive understanding and effective implementation of eHealth interventions across different contexts and user groups.