Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparative evaluation of three JAK2V617F mutation detection methods.

Christine Frantz1, Donna M Sekora, Donald C Henley

  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Canada.

American Journal of Clinical Pathology
|October 24, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI): A Legacy of 50 Years and the Road Ahead.

Vaccines·2025
Same author

Genetic characterization of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants in cancer and high-risk family screening cohorts in the UAE population.

Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology·2025
Same author

Special Issue: Challenges and Future Trends of COVID-19 Vaccination.

Vaccines·2025
Same author

Chirality-assisted enhancement of tripartite entanglement in waveguide QED.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Text analysis framework for identifying mutations among non-small cell lung cancer patients from laboratory data.

BMC medical research methodology·2024
Same author

Key Learnings from the Development and Early Use of Global Guidance on the Integration of COVID-19 Vaccination into Broader Health Systems.

Vaccines·2024
Same journal

Invasive urothelial carcinoma in association with surface low-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma: clinical and pathologic insights from a rare entity.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

CEACAM1 expression by immunohistochemistry in B-cell lymphomas and plasma cell myeloma.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

Comprehensive multicriteria life cycle assessment of biopsy processing in a surgical pathology department.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

Prognostic significance of Myb protein and its downstream target genes in lacrimal gland adenoid cystic carcinoma.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

Mismatch repair protein "nonclassic expression loss" pattern in colorectal cancer: an important staining pattern that is not well understood.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

Musculoskeletal pain in medical laboratory personnel: a cross-sectional study.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
See all related articles

Three molecular methods for detecting the JAK2V617F mutation in myeloproliferative disorders showed 100% concordance. Allele-specific PCR offered higher sensitivity than kit-based assays.

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Hematology
  • Oncology

Background:

  • The JAK2V617F mutation is linked to several chronic myeloproliferative disorders.
  • Accurate molecular detection assays are crucial for diagnosing these conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comparatively evaluate three distinct JAK2V617F molecular detection methods.
  • To assess the concordance and analytic sensitivity of these assays.

Main Methods:

  • Genomic DNA from blood or bone marrow samples was analyzed.
  • Methods included allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (AS-PCR) and kit-based restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) assays.
  • Analysis employed polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, capillary electrophoresis, and direct sequencing.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • All three methods demonstrated 100% concordance across a set of 36 samples.
  • Analytic sensitivities were 5% for kit-based methods and 0.01% for AS-PCR.
  • Kit-based assays showed consistent sensitivity irrespective of the electrophoresis technique used.

Conclusions:

  • The evaluated molecular assays for JAK2V617F detection are highly concordant.
  • AS-PCR exhibits superior analytic sensitivity compared to kit-based methods.
  • Direct sequencing is not sensitive enough for initial JAK2V617F diagnostic screening.