Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Measuring Ascending Aortic Stiffness In Vivo in Mice Using Ultrasound
Published on: December 2, 2014
Relationship between aortic stiffness and the development of coronary collateral in patients with coronary artery
Sükrü Celik1, Sahin Kaplan, Remzi Yilmaz
1KTU Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Trabzon, Turkey. scelik@meds.ktu.edu.tr
Insights
Aortic stiffness, a predictor of cardiovascular mortality, was assessed in relation to coronary collateral development. This study found no significant difference in aortic elastic properties between patients with poor or good collateral vessels.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Vascular Biology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Large artery stiffness is a key predictor of cardiovascular mortality.
- Aortic stiffness influences coronary artery perfusion and shear stress, potentially affecting collateral formation.
- Coronary collateral vessels play a crucial role in supplying blood to ischemic heart muscle.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between aortic stiffness and the development of coronary collateral vessels in patients with significant coronary artery disease.
- To determine if measures of aortic elastic properties differ between patients with poor versus good coronary collateral supply.
Main Methods:
- 106 patients with severe coronary artery stenosis (≥90%) were analyzed.
- Coronary collateral vessels were assessed using Rentrop grading (0-3) via angiography.
- Aortic stiffness was evaluated using aortic distensibility and stiffness indexes derived from echocardiography and sphygmomanometry.
Main Results:
- Patients were categorized into groups with poor (Rentrop grade 0-1) and good (Rentrop grade 2-3) collateral vessels.
- No significant differences were observed in aortic distensibility index (5.1 ±2.3 vs 5.7 ±3.3, p=0.31) between the groups.
- Similarly, no significant differences were found in the aortic stiffness index (4.02 ±2.3 vs 4.43 ±3.7, p=0.49) between patients with poor and good collateral vessels.
Conclusions:
- Aortic elastic properties do not appear to be a significant determinant of coronary collateral formation in patients with severe coronary artery disease.
- Coronary collateral development is likely a complex process influenced by multiple factors beyond aortic stiffness.
- Further research is needed to elucidate the multifaceted mechanisms underlying coronary collateralization.
Abstract:
Large artery stiffness is an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality and a major determinant of pulse pressure. The stiff aorta may result in greater systolic, lower diastolic, and wider pulse pressures, which may decrease coronary artery perfusion. Shear stress has been implicated in the development of coronary collateral. Decreased coronary perfusion may reduce shear stress and thus collateral formation. The goal of this study was to assess the relationship between the development of coronary collateral and aortic stiffness in patients with coronary artery disease. In 106 patients with at least one coronary artery stenosis of 90% or greater, collateral vessels were assessed angiographically by the Rentrop grading (grade 0-3), establishing two groups: 50 patients with poor collateral vessels (Rentrop grade 0 or 1), and 56 patients with good collateral vessels (Rentrop grade 2 or 3). Internal aortic root diameters were measured at 3 cm above the aortic valve by use of two-dimensional guided M-mode transthoracic echocardiography, and arterial pressure was measured simultaneously at the brachial artery by sphygmomanometry. Two indexes of the aortic elastic properties were measured: aortic distensibility index was calculated by use of the formula: 2 x (systolic diameter - diastolic diameter)/(diastolic diameter) x (pulse pressure) in cm(- 2)dyn(-1)10(-6). The aortic stiffness index was calculated by: (systolic blood pressure/diastolic blood pressure)/pulsatile change in diameter/diastolic diameter. The aortic distensibility index and the aortic stiffness index were not significantly different between the patients with poor collateral vessels and those with good collateral vessels (5.1 +/-2.3 vs 5.7 +/-3.3 cm(-2)dyn( -1)10(-6), p = 0.31; 4.02 +/-2.3 vs 4.43 +/-3.7, p = 0.49, respectively). There were no significant differences regarding the aortic elastic properties between the patients with poor collateral vessels and those with good collateral vessels, suggesting that collateral formation is a complex phenomenon consisting of several distinct processes.
Related Concept Videos
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Atherosclerosis I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management