Association between angina and treatment satisfaction after myocardial infarction
Mary E Plomondon1, David J Magid, Frederick A Masoudi
1Cardiovascular Outcomes Research, Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver VA Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA. Meg.Plomondon@va.gov
Insights
Angina after myocardial infarction (MI) significantly lowers patient treatment satisfaction. Effective angina management post-MI is crucial for improving patient care quality.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Patient Outcomes Research
Background:
- Patient satisfaction is a key indicator of healthcare quality.
- Limited understanding of clinical factors impacting satisfaction after myocardial infarction (MI).
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if angina following MI is independently linked to reduced treatment satisfaction.
- To investigate the association between post-MI angina and patient-reported satisfaction.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 1,815 MI patients across 19 U.S. centers.
- Assessment of angina using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) at 1 and 6 months post-MI.
- Measurement of treatment satisfaction using the SAQ at 6 months, with multivariable regression analysis.
Main Results:
- 62% of patients experienced no angina at 1 and 6 months.
- 13% had persistent angina, and 11% developed new angina within 6 months.
- Both new and persistent angina were strongly associated with lower treatment satisfaction (p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
- Angina affects nearly 25% of patients within 6 months of MI.
- Post-MI angina is a significant predictor of decreased treatment satisfaction.
- Prioritizing angina surveillance and management can enhance patient satisfaction and overall care quality.
Background:
Patient satisfaction is increasingly recognized as a quality indicator and important outcome of care. Little is known about the clinical factors associated with satisfaction after myocardial infarction (MI).
Objective:
To assess the hypothesis that angina after MI is independently associated with lower treatment satisfaction.
Methods:
We evaluated 1,815 MI patients from 19 U.S. centers. Angina was measured at 1 and 6 months after MI using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ). Treatment satisfaction was measured using the SAQ at 6 months. Multivariable regression was used to evaluate the association between 1- and 6-month angina and 6-month treatment satisfaction.
Results:
Sixty-two percent of patients had no angina at 1 and 6 months after MI, 14% had transient angina (angina at 1 month, no angina at 6 months), 11% had new angina (angina at 6 months only), and 13% had persistent angina (angina at both 1 and 6 months). In unadjusted analysis, the presence of angina at 6 months, whether new or persistent, was associated with lower treatment satisfaction (p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, angina was associated with lower treatment satisfaction [relative risk (RR) 2.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.4-3.5 patients with new angina; RR 3.1, 95% CI 2.5-3.9 patients with persistent angina, vs patients with no angina].
Conclusions:
In conclusion, angina in the 6 months following MI is present in almost 1 in 4 patients and is strongly associated with lower treatment satisfaction. This suggests the importance of angina surveillance and management after MI as a possible target to improve treatment satisfaction and, thereby, quality of care.
Related Concept Videos
Angina V: Nursing Management
Angina IV: Management
Angina III: Clinical Manifestations and Assessment
Angina II: Classification
Angina I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
