Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Calculating nominal group statistics in collaboration studies.

Daniel B Wright1

  • 1Psychology Department, University of Sussex, Brighton, England. danw@sussex.ac.uk

Behavior Research Methods
|October 26, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Increasing flood hazard in the Lower Mississippi River due to extreme storm clustering.

Science advances·2025
Same author

Conceptual data-driven approach for analyzing the vulnerability of coastal roadways to groundwater level changes.

Journal of environmental management·2025
Same author

Convergent latitudinal erosion of circadian systems in a rapidly diversifying order of fishes.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Justifying Responses Affects the Relationship Between Confidence and Accuracy.

Experimental psychology·2024
Same author

Psychometric evaluation of the Trust in Science and Scientists Scale.

Royal Society open science·2024
Same author

Identity resilience, science mistrust, COVID-19 risk and fear predictors of vaccine positivity and vaccination likelihood: A survey of UK and Portuguese samples.

Journal of health psychology·2023
Same journal

The Rhythm Reproduction Task for children: A psychometric examination.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

QualGames: A Qualtrics implementation and a database of behavioral game theory tasks.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

PyLossless: A non-destructive EEG processing pipeline.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

"It makes sense to me": Examining data file column names in the visual cognitive literature.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

Planned missingness in intensive longitudinal studies: Extensions and comparisons of multiform designs.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

A validity-guided workflow for robust large language model research in psychology.

Behavior research methods·2026
See all related articles

Researchers often estimate nominal group performance by pairing individuals, but this can introduce errors. This study introduces improved methods for calculating nominal group statistics, offering more accurate estimates for psychological research.

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Quantitative Psychology

Background:

  • Researchers frequently compare group output to individual performance.
  • Estimating nominal group output (two individuals working together) is common.
  • Current pairing methods (random or file-based) may introduce significant error.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and address sources of error in nominal group estimation.
  • To develop and evaluate alternative statistical methods for nominal groups.
  • To provide accurate and reliable methods for psychological research.

Main Methods:

  • Developed two alternative methods for calculating nominal group statistics.
  • Method 1: Statistics for all permissible sets of pairs (computationally intensive).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Method 2: Statistics for all possible pairs (all-pairs procedure).

    • Main Results:

    • Both alternative methods provide accurate estimates for the mean and trimmed mean.
    • The 'all pairs' procedure yields a biased estimate for variance.
    • Simulations indicate a specific adjustment is recommended for variance estimation.

    Conclusions:

    • Standard methods for nominal group estimation in psychology can be flawed.
    • The 'all pairs' method, with a proposed variance adjustment, offers improved accuracy.
    • Provides accessible S-Plus/R functions to facilitate implementation in research.