Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Trabecular bone score in women with differentiated thyroid cancer on long-term TSH-suppressive therapy.

Journal of endocrinological investigation·2021
Same author

Clinical Features and Disease Management in Adult Patients With Atopic Dermatitis Receiving Care at Reference Hospitals in Brazil: the ADAPT Study.

Journal of investigational allergology & clinical immunology·2020
Same author

Photopatch and patch testing in 63 patients with frontal fibrosing alopecia: a case series.

The British journal of dermatology·2018
Same author

Gnatophyma: a rare variant of phyma.

Clinical and experimental dermatology·2008
Same author

Pseudolymphoma as adverse reaction to tamoxifen.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2008
Same author

Non-influence of fetal gender on ductus venosus Doppler flow in the first trimester.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2008

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Precision Implementation of Minimal Erythema Dose (MED) Testing to Assess Individual Variation in Human Inflammatory Response
06:31

Precision Implementation of Minimal Erythema Dose (MED) Testing to Assess Individual Variation in Human Inflammatory Response

Published on: October 3, 2019

Comparative study of patch test using traditional method vs. prior skin abrading.

M F M Fernandes1, J F de Mello, M C Pires

  • 1Allergy and Immunology Service, Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual Francisco Morato de Oliveira, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. fernandeseberto@uol.com.br

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV
|October 26, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Abrading the skin before patch testing for allergic contact dermatitis increases positive reactions and relevance compared to traditional methods. However, nickel sulphate relevance showed no significant difference between the two techniques.

More Related Videos

A Suction Blister Protocol to Study Human T-cell Recall Responses In Vivo
11:17

A Suction Blister Protocol to Study Human T-cell Recall Responses In Vivo

Published on: August 11, 2018

In Vitro Scratch Assay to Demonstrate Effects of Arsenic on Skin Cell Migration
09:24

In Vitro Scratch Assay to Demonstrate Effects of Arsenic on Skin Cell Migration

Published on: February 23, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Precision Implementation of Minimal Erythema Dose (MED) Testing to Assess Individual Variation in Human Inflammatory Response
06:31

Precision Implementation of Minimal Erythema Dose (MED) Testing to Assess Individual Variation in Human Inflammatory Response

Published on: October 3, 2019

A Suction Blister Protocol to Study Human T-cell Recall Responses In Vivo
11:17

A Suction Blister Protocol to Study Human T-cell Recall Responses In Vivo

Published on: August 11, 2018

In Vitro Scratch Assay to Demonstrate Effects of Arsenic on Skin Cell Migration
09:24

In Vitro Scratch Assay to Demonstrate Effects of Arsenic on Skin Cell Migration

Published on: February 23, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Dermatology
  • Allergology
  • Immunology

Background:

  • Patch testing is crucial for diagnosing allergic contact dermatitis.
  • Current methods may not fully replicate initial allergen contact conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate if abrading the skin impacts patch test positivity compared to traditional methods.
  • To assess the relevance of positive patch tests for each method.
  • To compare the specific relevance of nickel sulphate using both techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of patch test results on abraded versus unabraded skin.
  • Analysis of probable, possible, past, and present relevance of allergens.
  • Specific evaluation of nickel sulphate relevance.

Main Results:

  • Higher positivity rates were observed on the abraded side (75.9%) versus the unabraded side (2.3%).
  • Relevance analysis showed statistically significant differences between abraded and unabraded methods (77.3% vs 21.3%).
  • Nickel sulphate relevance did not significantly differ between the two methods.

Conclusions:

  • Abrasion enhances patch test positivity and relevance, though it may increase discordance for strong reactions.
  • Significant differences in relevance were found between abraded and unabraded patch testing.
  • Nickel sulphate testing showed comparable relevance regardless of skin abrasion.