Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model01:15

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Critical Thinking II01:25

Critical Thinking II

Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:
Patient-centered Care01:13

Patient-centered Care

Patient-centered care involves delivering care beyond inpatient hospitalization. Reflective practice can enhance a patient-centered approach. Reflective practice is a process of reasoning that considers all aspects of the present situation, including practicalities, learning from personal practice, and consideration of patient needs. Patients appreciate care decisions made while considering their input. Involving the patient in their care provides the patient with a sense of contribution rather...
Methods of Documentation III: PIE01:21

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:
Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
Methods of Documentation II: POMR01:26

Methods of Documentation II: POMR

The Problem-Oriented Medical Record (POMR) revolutionized medical record-keeping by introducing a systematic approach focusing on the patient's problems rather than merely listing symptoms. Dr. Lawrence Weed's introduction of this method in the 1960s marked a significant advancement in medical documentation. The POMR framework consists of four key components: the database, problem list, plan of care, and progress notes.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Quality from the patient's perspective: a one-year trial.

International journal of health care quality assurance·2012
Same author

Problem perception, technology and effectiveness in medical practice.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2012
Same author

Individual personal relations: effects on service quality.

International journal of health care quality assurance·2011
Same author

Porous titanium granules for implant stability and bone regeneration - a case followed for 12 years.

Upsala journal of medical sciences·2008
Same author

Task uncertainty and rationality in medical problem solving.

International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care·2006

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Professional or administrative value patterns? Clinical pathways in medical problem-solving processes.

Leif Holmberg1

  • 1Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden. leif.holmberg@staff.hkr.se

Health Services Management Research
|October 26, 2007
PubMed
Summary

This study explores how healthcare organizations balance two different value systems: professional and administrative. Administrative guidelines assume medical problems are predictable and can be solved with standard procedures. However, doctors often face unpredictable situations that these guidelines don't cover. The study suggests that different administrative models are needed for predictable and unpredictable medical processes. This could help improve how guidelines are used in real-world clinical settings.

Keywords:
healthcare managementclinical pathwaysinstitutional theorytask uncertainty

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Development and Implementation of a Multi-Disciplinary Technology Enhanced Care Pathway for Youth and Adults with Concussion
08:13

Development and Implementation of a Multi-Disciplinary Technology Enhanced Care Pathway for Youth and Adults with Concussion

Published on: January 20, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Development and Implementation of a Multi-Disciplinary Technology Enhanced Care Pathway for Youth and Adults with Concussion
08:13

Development and Implementation of a Multi-Disciplinary Technology Enhanced Care Pathway for Youth and Adults with Concussion

Published on: January 20, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare management and organizational behavior
  • Clinical decision-making in medical practice
  • Institutional theory in professional settings

Background:

Healthcare systems operate under dual institutional value patterns: professional and administrative. The administrative model assumes low task uncertainty in medical problem-solving. This assumption is supported by clinical pathways and administrative guidelines. However, clinical practice often shows high task uncertainty. Physicians frequently find these guidelines inadequate. They argue that guidelines fail to address deviations in patient care. This mismatch creates tension between administrative expectations and clinical realities. Existing guidelines impose uniform structures that may not fit all scenarios. The need for differentiated approaches becomes evident in varying uncertainty levels.

Purpose Of The Study:

This study examines the tension between administrative and professional value patterns in healthcare. It explores how medical problem-solving processes are structured under these dual frameworks. The goal is to understand how task uncertainty affects guideline implementation. The authors aim to identify why administrative guidelines often fail in practice. They investigate whether task uncertainty levels should dictate different administrative models. The study questions whether a one-size-fits-all approach is appropriate. It proposes that distinct performance standards may be needed for different uncertainty levels. The authors seek to clarify how guidelines can better align with clinical realities.

Main Methods:

The study analyzes the coexistence of professional and administrative value patterns in healthcare organizations. It evaluates how clinical pathways and administrative guidelines are perceived and implemented. The authors use institutional theory to frame their analysis. They compare administrative assumptions with clinical observations. The study reviews existing literature on task uncertainty in medical settings. It examines how physicians experience and respond to guideline limitations. The authors propose a framework for categorizing medical processes by uncertainty levels. They suggest that different administrative models may be required for high and low uncertainty scenarios.

Main Results:

Administrative guidelines assume low task uncertainty in medical processes. However, physicians often experience high task uncertainty in practice. Clinical pathways fail to address deviations and complex patient cases. The mismatch between administrative assumptions and clinical realities is significant. Guidelines impose uniform structures that may not fit all medical scenarios. Medical processes with low uncertainty can be organized independently from those with high uncertainty. Each process requires distinct performance standards and administrative models. The findings suggest that administrative guidelines should vary based on task uncertainty levels.

Conclusions:

The authors conclude that administrative guidelines should not be uniformly applied. Medical processes with low task uncertainty can follow structured clinical pathways. Processes with high task uncertainty require different administrative models. The study suggests that performance standards should vary by uncertainty level. Current guidelines may not be suitable for all clinical scenarios. Physicians need administrative support that aligns with their actual task uncertainty. The authors propose that institutional frameworks should adapt to clinical realities. This approach could improve guideline implementation and medical decision-making.

Administrative guidelines assume low task uncertainty, but physicians often face high task uncertainty in practice. This mismatch leads to inadequate guidelines that fail to address clinical deviations.

Clinical pathways are administrative tools that assume low task uncertainty. They provide structured guidelines for well-defined medical problems, but may not cover complex or uncertain scenarios.

Task uncertainty determines whether administrative guidelines are appropriate. High uncertainty requires different administrative models and performance standards than low uncertainty processes.

Institutional theory frames the analysis of how professional and administrative value patterns coexist in healthcare organizations. It helps explain the tension between guideline assumptions and clinical realities.

Processes with low task uncertainty need one set of performance standards, while those with high uncertainty require different standards. Each should have autonomous administrative guideline models.

The authors propose that administrative guidelines should vary based on task uncertainty levels. Different models are needed for high and low uncertainty medical processes.