Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation
Published on: February 10, 2023
Phase out persistent, bioaccumulative or highly toxic chemicals
Tracey Easthope1, Laurie Valeriano
1Environmental Health Director, Ecology Center, 117 N. Division St., Ann Arbor, MI 48104, USA. tracey@ecocenter.org
Persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic chemicals pose significant risks to health and ecosystems. New policies are urgently needed to phase out these hazardous substances, as current regulations are insufficient for effective management and restriction.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Toxicology
- Public Health Policy
Background:
- Persistent, bioaccumulative, and/or highly toxic (PBT) chemicals, including lindane, lead compounds, brominated flame retardants, and organophosphate pesticides, are still in commerce.
- Strong evidence indicates these chemicals threaten human and ecosystem health.
- The inherent characteristics of these chemicals make them difficult to manage safely, posing risks to workers, the environment, and ecosystems.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the need for prioritizing chemicals that cannot be safely managed for phase-out.
- To emphasize the necessity of a transparent process for identifying and prioritizing chemicals for phase-out.
- To identify the lack of governmental authority and efficient policy instruments for restricting the use and release of high-priority chemicals.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of existing chemical management policies and their limitations.
- Analysis of the characteristics of persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic chemicals.
- Assessment of governmental (federal, state, local) authority and policy instruments for chemical restriction.
Main Results:
- Certain hazardous chemicals remain in commerce despite known risks.
- Existing management strategies are insufficient to mitigate threats posed by these chemicals.
- Governmental bodies at all levels lack effective policy tools to phase out problematic chemicals.
Conclusions:
- Chemicals that cannot be managed safely must be prioritized for phase-out.
- A clear and transparent process is required to identify and prioritize chemicals for elimination.
- Development and implementation of effective policy instruments are crucial for phasing out hazardous chemicals at all governmental levels.
More Related Videos
08:49Vegetated Treatment Systems for Removing Contaminants Associated with Surface Water Toxicity in Agriculture and Urban Runoff
Published on: May 15, 2017
09:04Identifying Per- and Polyfluorinated Chemical Species with a Combined Targeted and Non-Targeted-Screening High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Workflow
Published on: April 18, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Types of Toxins
Air pollutants, primarily gases, pose significant threats to respiratory health, leading to conditions like hypoxia, lung cancer, and in extreme cases, death.
Environmental pollutants like...
Microbial Bioremediation of Pesticides
Toxicity Testing in Animals
Toxic Reactions: Overview
Toxicity falls into two primary categories: local and systemic.
Local toxicity appears at the exposure site, such as protein denaturation caused by caustic substances.
In contrast, systemic toxicity requires the toxic agent's absorption and distribution,...
Bioplastics
Enhanced Elimination of Poison
Antidotes serve a crucial role in counteracting the effects of poison by inhibiting enzymes responsible for producing harmful drug metabolites. In some cases, these toxic metabolites can be neutralized by endogenous cosubstrates, which are maintained at specific concentrations to prevent interaction with cellular macromolecules and subsequent cell death.
Renal excretion is the...