Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Advancing Perioperative Medication Safety: Consensus Recommendations From the 2024 Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation Stoelting Conference.

Anesthesia and analgesia·2026
Same author

Time-course based assessment of patient factors and their relationship to chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy.

Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Improving definitions and innovations for identification and prevention of postoperative opioid-induced respiratory depression (OIRD): Proceedings of the International Consensus Conference.

Journal of clinical anesthesia·2026
Same author

The Evolving Pharmacogenomic Toolbox in Anesthesiology.

Anesthesia and analgesia·2025
Same author

In Response.

Anesthesia and analgesia·2025
Same author

Longitudinal multi-omics analyses of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in response to taxanes.

BMC cancer·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 10, 2026

In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease
09:09

In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease

Published on: May 27, 2022

A simulation-based evaluation of a graphic cardiovascular display.

Robert W Albert1, James A Agutter, Noah D Syroid

  • 1Applied Medical Visualizations LLC, Salt Lake City, UT 84105, USA. ralbert@medvis.com

Anesthesia and Analgesia
|October 26, 2007
PubMed
Summary

A graphical cardiovascular display (GCD) improved anesthesiologists' detection and treatment of simulated adverse cardiopulmonary events. The GCD did not increase perceived workload, suggesting its utility in patient monitoring.

More Related Videos

Real-Time Cardiac Mapping with a Noninvasive Imageless Electrocardiographic Imaging System
10:17

Real-Time Cardiac Mapping with a Noninvasive Imageless Electrocardiographic Imaging System

Published on: April 11, 2025

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
09:20

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Published on: February 13, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 10, 2026

In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease
09:09

In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease

Published on: May 27, 2022

Real-Time Cardiac Mapping with a Noninvasive Imageless Electrocardiographic Imaging System
10:17

Real-Time Cardiac Mapping with a Noninvasive Imageless Electrocardiographic Imaging System

Published on: April 11, 2025

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
09:20

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Published on: February 13, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Anesthesiology
  • Medical Simulation
  • Cardiopulmonary Monitoring

Background:

  • Graphic displays can aid in early adverse event detection and management.
  • Previous research indicated graphical presentation of cardiovascular variables improved simulated ischemic event detection.
  • A revised graphical cardiovascular display (GCD) was evaluated for hemodynamic variables, with or without a pulmonary artery catheter.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the utility of a revised GCD in recognizing various simulated adverse cardiopulmonary events.
  • To determine if the revised GCD improves detection and management of adverse events.
  • To assess if the revised GCD impacts perceived workload.

Main Methods:

  • Sixteen anesthesiologists and residents participated in a simulation-based evaluation.
  • Participants were divided into two groups, managing six simulated adverse events.
  • The GCD was utilized in half the simulations; interventions were recorded, transcribed, and rated by blinded experts.

Main Results:

  • Anesthesiologists using the GCD were rated more effective overall and in specific scenarios.
  • The GCD influenced the time to detect and treat critical events.
  • No significant differences in perceived workload were found between groups.

Conclusions:

  • Treatment interventions using the GCD were rated superior by expert anesthesiologists.
  • The GCD demonstrated a modest improvement in detecting myocardial ischemia and elevated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure.
  • The GCD shows potential as a valuable tool for monitoring patients during adverse cardiopulmonary events.