Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Wouldn't It Be Nice to Not Fall for It Twice? Prior Experience Does Not Abolish the Impact of Expectancy Violations on Attention Capture.

Vision (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Novel evidence for cue-based retrieval of top-down sets in spatial cueing.

Frontiers in cognition·2026
Same author

Rhythmic alternate prioritization in auditory feature-based attention.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

What captures women's visual attention and what they remember in romantic encounters: eye-tracking metrics and self-reports.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

The influence of perceptual and cognitive load on contingent-capture effects.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same author

Rhythmic Fluctuations in Tactile Attention.

The European journal of neuroscience·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Comparing sensitivity across different processing measures under metacontrast masking conditions.

Ulrich Ansorge1, Bruno G Breitmeyer, Stefanie I Becker

  • 1Institute of Cognitive Science, Department of Psychology, Universitaet Osnabrueck, Albrechtstrasse 28, D-49076 Osnabrueck, Germany. ulrich.ansorge@uni-osnabrueck.de

Vision Research
|October 30, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Masked visual stimuli can influence responses even when not consciously perceived. This study shows visual rotation detection is less affected by masking than shape detection, impacting non-conscious processing research.

More Related Videos

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms
08:05

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms

Published on: February 10, 2016

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms
08:05

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms

Published on: February 10, 2016

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Metacontrast masking can interfere with conscious perception of visual stimuli.
  • Previous research indicates visual motion perception may be less susceptible to metacontrast masking.
  • Understanding the limits of masking is crucial for interpreting studies on non-conscious processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether visual rotation detection is more resistant to metacontrast masking than visual shape detection.
  • To explore the conditions under which masked shape information can be perceived.
  • To discuss the implications for theories of non-conscious visual processing.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted using metacontrast masking paradigms.
  • Participants performed detection tasks for visual rotation and shape stimuli under varying masking conditions.
  • Stimulus discriminability and task difficulty were manipulated.

Main Results:

  • Detection of visual rotation was significantly more spared from metacontrast masking compared to visual shape detection.
  • Shape detection improved when the task was made easier, suggesting some shape information was processed.
  • The degree of masking's effect varied depending on the visual attribute and task demands.

Conclusions:

  • Visual rotation is processed more robustly than visual shape under metacontrast masking.
  • Non-conscious processing of visual information is attribute-dependent.
  • Findings challenge the interpretation of masked priming effects solely based on non-conscious input processing.