Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026

09:15
The Attentional Set Shifting Task: A Measure of Cognitive Flexibility in Mice
Published on: February 4, 2015
A new test for detecting ongoing selection
Nobuyuki Inomata1, Masanobu Itoh, Rumi Kondo
1Department of Biology, Graduate School of Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan. ninomscb@mbox.nc.kyushu-u.ac.jp
Genetica
|October 30, 2007
Summary
Researchers developed a novel method to detect ongoing natural selection by comparing chromosome variations. This new viability selection test identified differences in allele frequency and haplotype numbers in a Drosophila melanogaster population.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary Biology
- Population Genetics
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Detecting ongoing natural selection in natural populations is challenging due to its rarity and limitations of existing methods.
- Past selection signatures in DNA are well-studied, but current selection is less understood.
- Viability selection, acting over a single generation, is a key evolutionary process that remains difficult to detect.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a new statistical test for detecting viability selection acting within a single generation.
- To compare measures of genetic variation between specific chromosomal groups to infer selection.
- To apply the new test to a natural population to assess its effectiveness.
Main Methods:
- A novel test was designed comparing variation measures in 'focal' chromosomes from heterozygous and homozygous individuals.
- Reference chromosomes were used to define 'focal' chromosomes, allowing for direct comparison.
- The test was applied to In(2L)t inversion polymorphism data in a Drosophila melanogaster population, using standard chromosomes as the focal class.
Main Results:
- The new test detected significant differences in allele frequency and haplotype number between the two groups of standard chromosomes.
- These differences suggest the presence of currently acting selection, despite no deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.
- The findings indicate the sensitivity of the new test in identifying selection pressures.
Conclusions:
- The developed test offers a powerful new approach to detect ongoing viability selection in natural populations.
- Combined with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium tests, this method can provide insights into the frequency of strong selection.
- This research advances our ability to study contemporary evolutionary processes in real-time.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Types of Selection
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
Multiple Comparison Tests
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Significance Testing: Overview
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...

