Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Guideline implementation research: exploring the gap between evidence and practice in the CRUSADE Quality Improvement
Andra L Blomkalns1, Matthew T Roe, Eric D Peterson
1Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Insights
The CRUSADE Quality Improvement Initiative improved care for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes by tracking guideline adherence and providing feedback. This led to better patient outcomes and informed future research on evidence-based medicine implementation.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Health Services Research
- Quality Improvement Science
Background:
- Translating evidence-based guidelines into routine clinical practice for acute coronary syndromes is challenging.
- The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association developed guidelines to standardize care for unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
- Quality improvement initiatives are crucial for bridging the gap between research findings and patient care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the impact of the Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress ADverse Outcomes with Early Implementation (CRUSADE) Quality Improvement Initiative.
- To track the utilization of guideline-based treatments and patient outcomes in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.
- To stimulate improvements in the delivery of acute and discharge guideline-based therapy.
Main Methods:
- The CRUSADE registry collected data on over 200,000 patients from more than 400 US hospitals.
- Performance feedback was provided to physicians and hospitals, comparing their data over time and against peer institutions.
- Quality improvement tools, including protocol order sets and educational programs, were implemented.
Main Results:
- The CRUSADE initiative facilitated improvements in the delivery of guideline-based therapy for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.
- Participating hospitals demonstrated enhanced patient outcomes following the implementation of quality improvement strategies.
- The initiative generated extensive research, resulting in over 52 publications and 86 abstracts.
Conclusions:
- The CRUSADE Quality Improvement Initiative successfully demonstrated the value of data feedback and quality improvement methods in enhancing patient care for acute coronary syndromes.
- The CRUSADE model, involving observation, intervention, investigation, and publication, provides a framework for evaluating evidence-based guideline impact.
- The success of CRUSADE led to its integration into the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) in 2007.
Abstract:
Translating research results into routine clinical practice remains difficult. Guidelines, such as the 2002 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Unstable Angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, have been developed to provide a streamlined, evidence-based approach to patient care that is of high quality and is reproducible. The Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress ADverse Outcomes with Early Implementation (CRUSADE) Quality Improvement Initiative was developed as a registry for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes to track the use of guideline-based acute and discharge treatments for hospitalized patients, as well as outcomes associated with the use of these treatments. Care for more than 200,000 patients at more than 400 high-volume acute care hospitals in the United States was tracked in CRUSADE, with feedback provided to participating physicians and hospitals regarding their performance over time and compared with similar institutions. Such access to data has proved important in stimulating improvements in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes care at participating hospitals for delivery of acute and discharge guideline-based therapy, as well as improving outcomes for patients. Providing quality improvement methods such as protocol order sets, continuing education programs, and a CRUSADE Quality Improvement Initiative toolbox serve to actively stimulate physician providers and institutions to improve care. The CRUSADE Initiative has also proven to be a fertile source of research in translation of treatment guidelines into routine care, resulting in more than 52 published articles and 86 abstracts presented at major emergency medicine and cardiology meetings. The cycle for research of guideline implementation demonstrated by CRUSADE includes four major steps--observation, intervention, investigation, and publication--that serve as the basis for evaluating the impact of any evidence-based guideline on patient care. Due to the success of CRUSADE, the American College of Cardiology combined the CRUSADE Initiative with the National Registry for Myocardial Infarction ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction program to form the National Cardiovascular Data Registry-Acute Coronary Treatment & Intervention Outcomes Network Registry beginning in January 2007.
Related Concept Videos
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
Nursing Implementation
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Nursing Clinical Information System
A Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS) is a specialized type of healthcare information system tailored to meet the unique needs of nursing practice. It incorporates the principles of nursing informatics to streamline information management and improve the quality of care delivery.
Critical attributes of NCIS include: