Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
Bias01:22

Bias

Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Understanding Deception01:14

Understanding Deception

Deception is a pervasive aspect of human communication. Empirical studies have shown that most individuals engage in some form of deceit on a daily basis, with approximately 20% of social exchanges involving deceptive elements. Lying follows a developmental trajectory, peaking during adolescence and declining with age, possibly due to the maturation of cognitive control and social accountability.Cognitive and Social Factors in Deception DetectionDespite its prevalence, accurately detecting...
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence categorization, a person will feel...
Correspondence Bias01:17

Correspondence Bias

Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the prevalence of...
Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Measuring sensitivity to conflicts of interest: a preliminary test of method.

Science and engineering ethics·2011
Same author

Evaluating research misconduct policies at major research universities: a pilot study.

Accountability in research·2006
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 10, 2026

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
09:12

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress

Published on: July 4, 2013

Sensitivity to research misconduct: a conceptual model.

Rebecca Ann Lind1, Tammy Swenson Lepper

  • 1Department of Communication, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA.

Medicine and Law
|November 1, 2007
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new model for assessing research misconduct (RM) sensitivity, defining it as a learnable cognitive skill. The model provides a framework for measuring awareness of potential misconduct and its implications in research settings.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 10, 2026

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
09:12

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress

Published on: July 4, 2013

Area of Science:

  • * Research Ethics
  • * Scientific Integrity
  • * Cognitive Psychology

Background:

  • * Existing research explores ethical sensitivity assessment techniques.
  • * Prior work in ethical sensitivity assessment forms the foundation for this study.
  • * The need for a structured approach to evaluating sensitivity to research misconduct is evident.

Purpose of the Study:

  • * To present a conceptual model for assessing research misconduct sensitivity (RMsen).
  • * To propose conceptual and operational definitions for RMsen.
  • * To explore potential methods for measuring RMsen as a cognitive ability.

Main Methods:

  • * Development of a conceptual model based on prior ethical sensitivity research.
  • * Definition of research misconduct sensitivity (RMsen) including conceptual and operational aspects.
  • * Identification of key content domains (situational characteristics, RM issues, consequences, stakeholders) and dimensions (time, breadth, depth) for assessment.

Main Results:

  • * RMsen is conceptualized as a learnable cognitive skill, not an innate trait.
  • * The model outlines how RMsen involves recognizing the potential for misconduct and making ethical decisions.
  • * Proposed assessment indicators span multiple content domains and dimensions.

Conclusions:

  • * The developed model offers a framework for assessing research misconduct sensitivity (RMsen).
  • * RMsen can be understood and measured as a cognitive ability.
  • * The model and methods may be adaptable for assessing broader responsible conduct of research.