Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Optional vena cava filters: what, why, and when.

John A Kaufman1

  • 1Dotter Institute/Oregon Health & Science University, Portland 97305, USA. kaufmajo@ohsu.edu

Vascular
|November 3, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Examination of Race and Ethnicity After Revascularization in the BEST-CLI Trial.

Annals of surgery·2025
Same author

Impact of Diameter Mismatch Between the Inflow Vein and Stent on Patency in Thrombotic Iliac Vein Lesions.

Cardiovascular and interventional radiology·2025
Same author

Risks of Birth Defects Following In Utero Exposures to Unregulated Brominated Haloacetic Acids.

Birth defects research·2025
Same author

Cost-effectiveness of endovascular versus open surgery for chronic limb-threatening ischemia.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2025
Same author

Application of Toxicologically Informed Relative Potency Factors to Examine Associations between Water Disinfection Byproducts and Birth Defects.

Environmental science & technology·2025
Same author

Antiproliferative endovascular drug technology is associated with fewer major reinterventions after femoropopliteal interventions for chronic limb-threatening ischemia.

Journal of vascular surgery·2025
Same journal

Novel subcutaneous side branch access technique compared to traditional access in radiofrequency ablation of the greater saphenous vein.

Vascular·2026
Same journal

Basilic vein access as an effective alternative for endovascular embolization of pelvic varicose veins: A retrospective-cohort based population study.

Vascular·2026
Same journal

A seven-year single-center experience with large-bore percutaneous closure in endovascular aneurysm repair.

Vascular·2026
Same journal

Comparative efficacy of open endarterectomy versus endovascular treatments in common femoral artery stenocclusive disease: A Bayesian hierarchical meta-analysis.

Vascular·2026
Same journal

Predicting treatment outcome in sclerotherapy of reticular veins and telangiectasia using machine learning: A comprehensive analysis and performance evaluation.

Vascular·2026
Same journal

Conservative management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm secondary to type II endoleak.

Vascular·2026
See all related articles

Optional vena cava filters offer protection against pulmonary embolism. This review covers current and future devices, their rationale, and clinical application guidelines due to limited outcome data.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Devices
  • Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Interventional Radiology

Background:

  • Optional vena cava filters are emerging devices for pulmonary embolism prevention.
  • Limited data exists on the outcomes of these devices.
  • Recent US clinical availability necessitates a review of their use.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review current and future optional vena cava filter devices.
  • To discuss the rationale for non-permanent caval filtration.
  • To outline generally accepted guidelines for clinical application.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of current and emerging vena cava filter technology.
  • Analysis of the indications and contraindications for caval filtration.
  • Synthesis of existing guidelines and expert consensus on device use.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Overview of various vena cava filter designs and functionalities.
  • Discussion on the benefits of temporary versus permanent filtration.
  • Summary of current clinical practice recommendations.

Conclusions:

  • Optional vena cava filters represent an important advancement in pulmonary embolism prophylaxis.
  • Further research is needed to fully elucidate device-specific outcomes.
  • Standardized guidelines are crucial for optimal patient selection and management.