Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Routine medical examinations: a problem audited is a problem solved.

T Jaffa1, P Bruggen

  • 1Hill End Adolescent Unit, Hill End Hospital, St. Albans, Herts, U.K.

Journal of Adolescence
|December 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary

This study looked at how to help teenagers cooperate during routine medical exams in a hospital setting. The main challenge was that adolescents often resisted these exams. The researchers found that giving more detailed explanations helped, but when that wasn't enough, arranging meetings with other patients and staff improved cooperation. The study suggests that communication strategies and peer support can make a difference in medical settings. The findings support using tailored approaches to address specific challenges in adolescent care. The study focused on practical solutions that can be used in real-time clinical settings. The results show that simple changes in communication can lead to better outcomes. This approach was tested in a real-world environment and showed promising results.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Distinction awards.

British medical journal·2010
Same author

Do inpatients on adolescent units recover? A study of outcome and acceptability of treatment.

European child & adolescent psychiatry·2000
Same author

Bilateral foot-drop in a patient with anorexia nervosa.

The International journal of eating disorders·1997
Same author

Secrets and spies. Interview by Jo Waters.

Nursing times·1997
Same author

Adolescent psychiatry services.

The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science·1995
Same author

ABC of sleep disorders. Sleep disorders in children.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·1993

Area of Science:

  • Adolescent health care management
  • Clinical communication strategies
  • Pediatric inpatient care

Background:

In pediatric inpatient settings, ensuring cooperation during routine medical exams can be challenging. Prior research has shown that adolescents often resist medical procedures due to anxiety or lack of understanding. Established methods include verbal reassurance and parental involvement. However, no prior work had resolved how to improve cooperation when standard approaches fail. This gap motivated the need for alternative communication strategies. The study aimed to address this specific challenge in adolescent care. The focus was on practical solutions rather than general psychological theories. The goal was to find a method that could be applied directly in clinical settings. This approach aligns with broader efforts to enhance patient engagement in healthcare.

Purpose Of The Study:

The study aimed to improve adolescent cooperation during routine medical exams in an inpatient unit. The specific problem was resistance to medical procedures among teenagers. The motivation was to find a practical solution that could be implemented in real-time clinical settings. The study sought to test whether additional explanations and group meetings would help. It was already known that adolescents often struggle with medical procedures. The study focused on communication strategies rather than medical interventions. The goal was to reduce resistance through improved understanding and peer support. This approach was chosen to address the unique challenges of adolescent inpatient care.

Keywords:
adolescent health caremedical communicationinpatient cooperationpeer support in medicine

Frequently Asked Questions

The study found that adding explanations and arranging peer meetings improved adolescent cooperation during exams.

Staff provided more detailed explanations and arranged meetings with other patients and staff when resistance occurred.

Peer meetings were included to provide support and clarify concerns when individual explanations were insufficient.

Additional explanations helped clarify the purpose of exams and reduced resistance among adolescents.

No adverse effects were reported from the new communication strategies used in the study.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The study used an observational approach to assess cooperation levels during routine exams. Staff recorded instances where adolescents refused or resisted medical procedures. In response, additional explanations were given to clarify the purpose of exams. When resistance persisted, a meeting was arranged with other patients and staff. The meetings aimed to provide peer support and clarify concerns. The study tracked changes in cooperation rates after implementing these strategies. No new medical tools or procedures were introduced. The focus was on modifying communication and support structures. The approach was tested in a real-world clinical setting.

Main Results:

The study found that additional explanations significantly increased cooperation among adolescents. When meetings were arranged with other patients and staff, resistance decreased further. The success rate improved from low to moderate after implementing these changes. The most significant improvement was observed in cases where initial explanations were insufficient. The study reported a measurable increase in willingness to undergo exams. No adverse effects were noted from the new communication strategies. The results suggest that peer involvement enhances cooperation. The findings support the use of tailored communication in adolescent care.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that additional explanations and peer meetings improve adolescent cooperation. These strategies may help reduce resistance in inpatient settings. The study suggests that communication adjustments can address specific challenges in care. The findings support the use of group discussions when individual explanations fail. The authors propose that peer involvement enhances trust and understanding. The study does not claim that these methods are essential for all cases. The results suggest a practical solution for a specific clinical problem. The authors emphasize the importance of adapting communication to patient needs.

The authors suggest that the new approach may help reduce resistance in inpatient settings by improving communication.