Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evidence for adaptive design in human gaze preference.

C A Conway1, B C Jones, L M DeBruine

  • 1Face Research Laboratory, School of Psychology, College of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 2UB, UK. c.conway@abdn.ac.uk

Proceedings. Biological Sciences
|November 8, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Epigenetic study of the long-term effects of gulf War illness.

Frontiers in genetics·2025
Same author

Epigenetic study of the long-term effects of Gulf War illness.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024
Same author

COVID-19 and vertical transmission: assessing the expression of ACE2/TMPRSS2 in the human fetus and placenta to assess the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2021
Same author

No Evidence That Men's Voice Pitch Signals Formidability.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2019
Same author

Mannose receptor (MR) and Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) influence phagosome maturation during Leishmania infection.

Parasite immunology·2018
Same author

DUOX1 silencing in lung cancer promotes EMT, cancer stem cell characteristics and invasive properties.

Oncogenesis·2016
Same journal

Chronic limb loading results in remarkable load carriage economy in growing fowl.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Motion-from-structure in face perception: expectations of natural face motion depend on face shape.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Unification and generalization of models of zygote survival.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Phenological type- and diameter-dependent effects of individual light availability and interannual climate variation on tree growth.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Interaction range of common goods shapes Black Queen dynamics beyond the cheater-cooperator narrative.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Stingray spine diversity reflects performance trade-offs linked to puncture and breakability.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
See all related articles

People prefer direct gaze more when viewing attractive happy faces than disgusted faces. This preference is stronger for opposite-sex faces, suggesting mating-related adaptive design in face perception.

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary Psychology
  • Social Cognition
  • Human Face Perception

Background:

  • Previous research focused on physical cues influencing face preferences.
  • Limited investigation into how social cues, like gaze and expression, affect face preferences.
  • Social interest cues (gaze direction, facial expressions) are crucial for social interaction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of facial cues to social interest on face preferences.
  • To examine how gaze direction and facial expressions interact to influence attractiveness judgments.
  • To determine if these effects differ for opposite-sex versus same-sex faces and for attractiveness versus likeability.

Main Methods:

  • Participants judged attractiveness and likeability of faces displaying direct or averted gaze.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Faces varied in emotional expression (happy vs. disgusted).
  • Two studies were conducted, focusing on attractiveness (Study 1) and likeability (Study 2).
  • Main Results:

    • Stronger preference for direct gaze when judging attractive happy faces compared to disgusted faces.
    • This effect was more pronounced for opposite-sex faces in attractiveness judgments (Study 1).
    • No opposite-sex bias in gaze preference was found for likeability judgments (Study 2).

    Conclusions:

    • Face preferences exhibit a context-sensitive, opposite-sex bias for perceiver-directed smiles.
    • Gaze preference appears to facilitate efficient allocation of mating effort, indicating adaptive design.
    • Perceptual mechanisms for face preferences are finely tuned to social and sexual contexts.