Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dynamic anterior cervical plates.

John M Rhee1, K Daniel Riew

  • 1Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory Spine Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.

The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
|November 9, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Anterior Cervical Approach to Vertebral Artery Exposure: A Step-By-Step Surgical Technique Guide By the Cervical Spine Research Society.

Clinical spine surgery·2026
Same author

Functional myotome mapping via triggered electromyography during intraoperative cervical rootlet stimulation.

Medicine·2026
Same author

Prognostic factors for spinal cord cavernous hemangioma resection and optimal surgical timing for symptomatic patients.

Journal of neurosurgery. Spine·2026
Same author

Enhanced recovery after surgery clinical pathway in oblique lumbar interbody fusion: overcoming postoperative pain to improve compliance and recovery. A prospective randomized noninferiority trial.

Journal of neurosurgery. Spine·2025
Same author

Different nuances between patient- and surgeon-reported outcomes in intramedullary ependymoma surgery.

Journal of neurosurgery. Spine·2025
Same author

Design, Development, Funding, and Implementation of the CSRS Registry: A Prospective Multicenter Clinical Cervical Spine Registry.

Clinical spine surgery·2025
Same journal

Surgical Fixation Versus Cast Immobilization for Adults With Bicortical Scaphoid Fractures: A Target Trial Emulation of the SWIFFT Trial.

The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons·2026
Same journal

Dementia as a Marker of Poor Outcome After Hip Hemiarthroplasty.

The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons·2026
Same journal

Fix or Replace: Evidence for Treatment Options in the Management of Femoral Neck Fractures.

The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons·2026
Same journal

Epidemiology, Treatment Patterns, and Comorbidities of Trigger Finger: A Contemporary Population-Based Analysis.

The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons·2026
Same journal

Posterior Approaches to Pilon Fractures: Considerations, Indications, and Outcomes.

The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons·2026
Same journal

Effect of Season on Patient-reported Outcomes and Discharge Disposition in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons·2026
See all related articles

Dynamic cervical plates offer biomechanical advantages over rigid plates in anterior cervical fusion. However, surgeons must understand potential complications like settling and ensure proper technique to optimize outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Spine Surgery
  • Orthopedic Biomechanics
  • Implant Design

Background:

  • Graft- and plate-related complications are frequent in anterior cervical fusion.
  • Plate design is a potential factor influencing these complications.
  • Dynamic cervical plates aim to improve load sharing and motion resistance compared to rigid plates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the biomechanical advantages and potential drawbacks of dynamic cervical plates versus rigid plates in anterior cervical fusion.
  • To highlight concerns regarding dynamic plate settling, segmental kyphosis, foraminal narrowing, and fusion rates.
  • To emphasize the importance of surgeon familiarity with dynamic plate variations and proper surgical technique.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and biomechanical analysis of dynamic versus rigid cervical plate systems.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of theoretical advantages and potential complications based on existing data and clinical concerns.
  • Analysis of factors influencing graft- and plate-related complications in anterior cervical fusion.

    • Main Results:

    • Dynamic plates theoretically offer improved load sharing and motion control.
    • Concerns exist regarding dynamic plate settling, potentially causing segmental kyphosis or foraminal narrowing.
    • Potential for excessive motion with dynamic plates may impact fusion rates.

    Conclusions:

    • Dynamic cervical plates present theoretical biomechanical benefits for anterior cervical fusion.
    • Surgeons must be aware of and manage potential complications associated with dynamic plate settling.
    • Appropriate surgical technique is crucial to accommodate expected settling and optimize patient outcomes.