Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Upper extremity trauma: current trends in management.

W M Stone1, R J Fowl, S R Money

  • 1Division of Vascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Scottsdale, AZ 85054, USA. stone.william@mayo.edu

The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery
|November 9, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Ochsner journal·2011
Same author

Minimally invasive vascular techniques.

Ochsner journal·2011
Same author

Brave new world: the role for endovascular aneurysm repair in contemporary vascular surgery.

The Journal of cardiovascular surgery·2003
Same author

Superior mesenteric artery aneurysms: is presence an indication for intervention?

Journal of vascular surgery·2002
Same author

Prevention and management of ureteral injuries during aortic surgery.

Seminars in vascular surgery·2001
Same author

Influence of NASCET/ACAS trial eligibility on outcome after carotid endarterectomy.

Journal of vascular surgery·2001
Same journal

Pelvic venous disease and lymphatic dysfunction: evaluating the evidence for a proposed continuum.

The Journal of cardiovascular surgery·2026
Same journal

Incidence of post-dissection aneurysmal formation and need for secondary intervention after surgery for acute type A aortic dissections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

The Journal of cardiovascular surgery·2026
Same journal

The expertise effect: how advancing skills in frozen elephant trunk have broadened surgical indication for acute dissection.

The Journal of cardiovascular surgery·2026
Same journal

Outcomes of pulmonary embolism response teams: a systematic review.

The Journal of cardiovascular surgery·2026
Same journal

Use of large bore devices in the treatment of pulmonary embolism.

The Journal of cardiovascular surgery·2026
Same journal

Contemporary role of systemic thrombolysis in the management of acute pulmonary embolism.

The Journal of cardiovascular surgery·2026
See all related articles

This review covers upper extremity trauma, focusing on vascular and neurologic injuries. Endovascular approaches improve survival and reduce morbidity from vascular trauma, but long-term outcomes depend on associated injuries.

Area of Science:

  • Trauma Surgery
  • Vascular Surgery
  • Neurology

Background:

  • Upper extremity trauma presents complex challenges due to the proximity of vital structures (veins, arteries, nerves).
  • Vascular injuries are immediately life-threatening, while orthopedic and neurologic injuries cause long-term disability.
  • Anatomic complexities in the upper extremity complicate the management of vascular injuries.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review management trends for vascular and neurologic injuries resulting from upper extremity trauma.
  • To highlight the evolution of treatment strategies, particularly the impact of endovascular approaches.
  • To discuss the interplay between vascular control, procedural morbidity, and long-term patient outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review encompassing penetrating and blunt upper extremity trauma.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of historical and contemporary management strategies for vascular and neurologic injuries.
  • Evaluation of endovascular techniques versus traditional open repair for vascular trauma.
  • Main Results:

    • Endovascular approaches have significantly reduced morbidity associated with vascular interventions.
    • Remote access for reconstruction minimizes additional injury to the extremity.
    • Improved survival rates and decreased procedural morbidity are noted with endovascular techniques.

    Conclusions:

    • Endovascular interventions offer a less morbid approach to managing upper extremity vascular trauma.
    • While endovascular techniques enhance survival and reduce immediate complications, overall long-term outcomes are contingent on associated orthopedic and neurologic injuries.
    • A comprehensive management strategy addressing all injury types is crucial for optimal patient recovery.