Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Assessing vulnerability to suicide.

J Furst1, C L Huffine

  • 1California School of Professional Psychology, Alameda.

Suicide & Life-Threatening Behavior
|January 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Predictive potential of patient-specific immunological characteristics in solid cancers: circulating monocytes, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, T cells, and the T-cell receptor repertoire.

ESMO open·2026
Same author

High accuracy of external ventricular drainage placement using anatomical landmarks.

Neuro-Chirurgie·2020
Same author

Whispering gallery resonators with broken axial symmetry: Theory and experiment.

Optics express·2016
Same author

Utilisation of the ESMO-MCBS in practice of HTA.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2016
Same author

One-time suprapubic prostatectomy with perineal drainage; its advantages over Freyer's Operation.

La Semana medica·2010
Same author

Density functional theory based screening of ternary alkali-transition metal borohydrides: a computational material design project.

The Journal of chemical physics·2009
Same journal

A Randomized Controlled Trial With an Internal Pilot of a Co-Designed App Targeting Upstream Suicide-Related Risk and Protective Factors Among International Students.

Suicide & life-threatening behavior·2026
Same journal

Predicting Next-Day Passive Suicidal Ideation in At-Risk Youth.

Suicide & life-threatening behavior·2026
Same journal

Emotional Responses to Social Media and Non-Suicidal Self-Injury Among Adolescents.

Suicide & life-threatening behavior·2026
Same journal

Prevalence and Timing of Suicidal Ideation, Preparation, and Attempts Among Mass Shooting Survivors.

Suicide & life-threatening behavior·2026
Same journal

Suicidality of Indigenous Teenagers as an Anomic Adaptation to Frustration: An Empirical Test (Correlates of Indigenous Teenage Suicidality).

Suicide & life-threatening behavior·2026
Same journal

Feasibility, Acceptability, and Impact of the Couples Crisis Response Plan (CCRP) to Reduce Post-Discharge Suicide Risk: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Suicide & life-threatening behavior·2026
See all related articles

Suicidology experts inaccurately assessed suicide risk, rating men who died by suicide as less vulnerable than those who lived. Respondent gender and research involvement influenced accuracy in predicting suicide vulnerability.

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Criminology
  • Sociology

Background:

  • Assessing suicide risk is crucial for intervention.
  • Previous research indicates challenges in accurately predicting suicide.
  • Understanding expert biases in suicide risk assessment is vital.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the accuracy of suicidology experts in assessing suicide vulnerability.
  • To identify respondent characteristics associated with accurate suicide risk assessments.
  • To explore the impact of case history presentation on expert judgment.

Main Methods:

  • A survey was administered to 300 members of the American Association of Suicidology.
  • Participants rated the suicide vulnerability of four case histories (two completed suicides, two non-fatal attempts).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Respondents reported their confidence and provided demographic information.

    • Main Results:

    • Cases of completed suicide were rated as significantly less vulnerable than non-fatal cases.
    • Expert ratings of vulnerability were lower than chance expectations for completed suicides.
    • Respondent gender and level of research involvement predicted assessment accuracy.

    Conclusions:

    • Suicidology experts demonstrated biases in assessing suicide vulnerability.
    • Theoretical models may have limitations in capturing real-world suicide risk.
    • Respondent characteristics and study design influence the accuracy of suicide risk evaluations.