Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Exchanging honest employment references: tiptoeing between defamation and negligent hiring
1Health Care Management and Human Resources Consultant, Ontario, New York 14519, USA. mcligthouse@juno.com
Abstract:
In present day reference checking, many of the same organizations that seek as much information as possible about people they wish to hire resist giving out more than a bare minimum of information to other organizations. The strongest force driving this minimal reference information release is fear of legal action taken because of something said about an individual ("defamation," supposedly). Many employers seem so frightened of being sued for libel or slander that they share nothing of substance, usually not realizing that in supposedly protecting themselves against defamation charges, they are increasing the risk of negligent hiring charges. However, truthful reference information can be provided with minimal risk if it is provided in good faith, given only to those who have a legitimate need to know, is strictly job related, and is not communicated maliciously. References must always be provided objectively with information verifiable in personnel files.
Related Concept Videos
Torts III
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.
Torts II
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities III
Cultivating a culture of collaboration and mutual respect among nurses transcends mere enhancement...
Torts I
Intentional...
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities II
Communication between nurses and patients...