Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Using Luciferase to Image Bacterial Infections in Mice
Published on: February 18, 2011
Quantitative comparison of click beetle and firefly luciferases for in vivo bioluminescence imaging
Tewfik Miloud1, Carmen Henrich, Günter J Hämmerling
1German Cancer Research Center, Department of Molecular Immunology, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Abstract:
For bioluminescence imaging (BLI) of small animals, the most commonly used luciferase is Fluc from the firefly, but recently, green (CBGr99) and red (CBRed) click beetle luciferases became available. Because signal attenuation by tissues is lower for red light, red luciferases appear to be advantageous for BLI, but this has not been thoroughly tested. We compare different luciferases for BLI. For this purpose, cell transfectants are generated expressing comparable amounts of CBGr99, CBRed, or Fluc. This is achieved by coexpression of the luciferase with eGFP using the bicistronic 2A system, which results in stoichiometric coexpression of the respective proteins. In vitro, the CBGr99 transfectant exhibits the strongest total photon yield. For in vivo BLI, the transfectants are injected into mice at different locations. At a subcutaneous position, CBGr99 is clearly superior to the other luciferases. When the tumor cells are located in the peritoneum or lung, where more absorption by tissue occurs, CBGr99 and CBRed transfected cells emit a comparable number of red photons and are superior to Fluc, but CBGr99 reaches the maximum of the light emission faster than CBRed. Thus, although CBGr99 emits mainly green light, the high yield of total and red photons makes it an excellent candidate for BLI.
More Related Videos
11:43A Screenable In Vivo Assay for Mitochondrial Modulators Using Transgenic Bioluminescent Caenorhabditis elegans
Published on: October 16, 2015
07:12Bioluminescence-Based Tumor Quantification Method for Monitoring Tumor Progression and Treatment Effects in Mouse Lymphoma Models
Published on: July 7, 2016