Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Patient-reported outcomes: instrument development and selection issues.

Ralph R Turner1, Alexandra L Quittner, Bhash M Parasuraman

  • 1Phase V. Technologies Inc., Wellesley Hills, MA, USA. faze5rt@msn.com

Value in Health : the Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research
|November 13, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Stress management reduces severe depression and anxiety symptoms in adults with cystic fibrosis: Results from the coping and learning to manage stress (CALM) intervention.

Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society·2026
Same author

The Human Cost of Respiratory Care: Professional Quality of Life and Burnout Across Multidisciplinary Cystic Fibrosis Teams.

Chest·2026
Same author

Advancing Mental Healthcare for Individuals With Cystic Fibrosis in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Pediatric pulmonology·2026
Same author

Integrating cognitive behavioral therapy into specialty care for adolescents with cystic fibrosis: a feasibility trial.

Journal of pediatric psychology·2026
Same author

Stakeholder Priorities for Cystic Fibrosis Mental Health Research: A Community and Provider Survey.

Pediatric pulmonology·2026
Same author

Core outcome domains for <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> complex pulmonary disease: a MACCOR study.

ERJ open research·2025
Same journal

Are preference-weighted cancer-specific measures more sensitive than generic measures? A comparison of EQ-5D-5L, SF-6Dv2, FACT-8D and QLU-C10D in gastrointestinal cancers.

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2026
Same journal

Development and Validation of a Brief Healthcare Insecurity Scale in a Sample of U.S. Adults Living with and without HIV.

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2026
Same journal

A Competency Framework for Health Technology Assessment Expertise: Results from a Delphi Study.

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2026
Same journal

Physician-led Switching from Reference Biologics to Biosimilars: What is the Effect on selected Health-Related Outcomes and Costs for IBD Patients in Germany?

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2026
Same journal

Critical Comments by the European Medicines Agency on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Regulatory Submissions (2020-2023).

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2026
Same journal

Interpreting the Economic Value of TPEx in Recurrent or Metastatic HNSCC: The Importance of Decision Context, Utility Timing, and Treatment Burden.

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2026
See all related articles

Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) assessment requires a clear conceptual framework for developing credible instruments. Understanding patient perspectives and minimizing burden are crucial for meaningful PRO data collection and interpretation.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Psychometrics
  • Medical Informatics

Background:

  • Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) assessment involves collecting patient feedback through questionnaires.
  • Developing credible PRO instruments requires clarity on research objectives, target populations, and data credibility.
  • Researchers should first assess existing instruments before developing new ones to ensure efficiency and validity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline the essential components of developing robust patient-reported outcomes assessment instruments.
  • To discuss the integration of qualitative methods and modern psychometric approaches in PRO development.
  • To highlight the importance of conceptual frameworks, item development, scale construction, and respondent burden in PRO.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Literature review and conceptual analysis of PRO instrument development principles.
  • Discussion of qualitative methods for enriching conceptual frameworks and item development.
  • Exploration of modern psychometric methods like item banks and computer-adaptive testing in PRO.

    • Main Results:

    • A well-articulated conceptual framework is fundamental for PRO assessment, adaptable to specific populations.
    • Qualitative methods enhance conceptualization and facilitate technical measurement tasks.
    • Modern psychometric innovations and considerations of respondent burden are key to advancing PRO assessment.

    Conclusions:

    • Effective PRO assessment hinges on a strong conceptual foundation, rigorous development processes, and consideration of the patient experience.
    • The field is evolving with technological advancements, necessitating adaptation in instrument design and application.
    • Minimizing respondent burden is critical for ensuring the quality and utility of collected PRO data.