Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Influence of diabetes on cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without defibrillator in patients with advanced
Jalal K Ghali1, John Boehmer, Arthur M Feldman
1Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan 48201, USA.
Insights
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) significantly benefits diabetic patients with advanced heart failure (HF), reducing mortality and hospitalizations. Device therapy improved all measured endpoints compared to optimal pharmacologic therapy alone.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Diabetes Mellitus
Background:
- Diabetes is an independent predictor of morbidity and mortality in systolic heart failure (HF).
- Limited data exist on the impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in diabetic patients with advanced HF.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the influence of CRT with a defibrillator (CRT-D) or without a defibrillator (CRT-P) on outcomes in diabetic patients with advanced HF.
- To analyze the impact of CRT on mortality and hospitalization rates in this patient group.
Main Methods:
- Post hoc analysis of the Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing and Defibrillation in Heart Failure trial.
- Examined outcomes in 622 diabetic patients receiving CRT (CRT-D or CRT-P) versus optimal pharmacologic therapy.
- Utilized Cox proportional hazard models to adjust for numerous clinical and demographic variables.
Main Results:
- Diabetic patients receiving CRT showed substantial reductions in all-cause mortality or hospitalization (HR=0.77), all-cause mortality or cardiovascular hospitalization (HR=0.67), all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization (HR=0.52), and all-cause mortality (HR=0.67).
- Outcomes for diabetic patients with CRT were significantly improved compared to optimal pharmacologic therapy.
- Procedure-related complications and length of stay were similar between diabetic and nondiabetic patients.
Conclusions:
- CRT device therapy offers substantial benefits for diabetic patients with advanced HF.
- Significant improvements in all analyzed endpoints were observed in diabetic patients treated with CRT.
- CRT is a valuable therapeutic option for improving outcomes in this high-risk population.
Objectives:
We performed a post hoc analysis to determine the influence of cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) or without a defibrillator (CRT-P) on outcomes among diabetic patients with advanced heart failure (HF).
Background:
In patients with systolic HF, diabetes is an independent predictor of morbidity and mortality. No data are available on its impact on CRT-D or CRT-P in advanced HF.
Methods:
The database of the Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing and Defibrillation in Heart Failure trial was examined to determine the influence of CRT (CRT-D and CRT-P) on outcomes among diabetic patients. All-cause mortality or hospitalization, all-cause mortality or cardiovascular hospitalization, all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization, and all-cause mortality were analyzed among diabetic patients (n = 622). A Cox proportional hazard model, adjusting for age, gender, New York Heart Association, ischemic status, body mass index, left ventricular ejection fraction, heart rate, QRS, left or right bundle branch block, blood pressure, comorbidities (renal failure, carotid artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, coronary artery bypass grafting, and atrial fibrillation), medications, and device (with or without defibrillator), was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and significance.
Results:
The overall outcome of diabetic patients was similar to that of nondiabetic patients in the optimal pharmacologic therapy arm. With CRT, diabetic patients experienced a substantial reduction in all-cause mortality or all-cause hospitalization (HR = 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 62-0.97), all-cause mortality or cardiovascular hospitalization (HR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.53-0.85), all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization (HR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.40-0.69), and all-cause mortality (HR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.45-0.99) compared with optimal pharmacologic therapy. Procedure-related complications and length of stay were identical in diabetic and nondiabetic patients.
Conclusion:
In diabetic patients with advanced HF, there is a substantial benefit from device therapy with significant improvement in all end points.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
