Mean diffusivity, fractional anisotropy maps, and three-dimensional white-matter tractography by diffusion tensor

Masaaki Hori1, Keiichi Ishigame, Nobuyuki Shiraga

  • 1Department of Radiology, Toho University, 6-11-1 Omori-nishi, Ota, Tokyo, 143-8541, Japan. masahori@med.toho-u.ac.jp

European Radiology
|November 14, 2007
PubMed

Insights

Single-shot fast spin-echo diffusion tensor imaging (SSFSE-DTI) reduces artifacts compared to echo-planar imaging (EPI-DTI). However, EPI-DTI provides superior results for 3D white matter tractography.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI)
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Background:

  • Single-shot fast spin-echo (SSFSE) MRI is a newer technique for diffusion tensor imaging.
  • Conventional echo-planar imaging (EPI) is the more common DTI method but can suffer from artifacts and distortions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare SSFSE-DTI with conventional EPI-DTI for brain imaging.
  • To evaluate mean diffusivity maps, fractional anisotropy (FA) maps, and white matter tractography between the two techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Thirty patients with neurological disorders underwent brain MRI using both SSFSE-DTI and EPI-DTI sequences on a 1.5-Tesla imager.
  • Image analysis included qualitative comparison of mean diffusivity and FA maps.
  • Three-dimensional white matter tractography was performed on data from both techniques.

Main Results:

  • SSFSE-DTI demonstrated fewer image artifacts and geometric distortions compared to EPI-DTI.
  • White matter tractography using SSFSE-DTI was found to be inferior to that obtained with EPI-DTI.
  • EPI-DTI yielded more consistent and reliable results for 3D streamline fiber-tracking.

Conclusions:

  • SSFSE-DTI is a viable alternative to EPI-DTI, offering reduced artifacts and distortions.
  • Despite its advantages, SSFSE-DTI is currently less suitable for detailed 3D white matter tractography compared to EPI-DTI.