Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process

The scientific method provides the foundation for any research. It is the most reliable and objective of all forms of gaining knowledge and guides in applying research-based evidence in practice and conducting future research.
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be safely...

Qualitative Analysis

Qualitative Analysis

Qualitative analysis is the process of identifying elements, ions, or compounds in an unknown sample. It is the first and most fundamental type of analysis based on the hierarchy of analytical goals. This hierarchy is significant as it provides a structured approach to scientific research, with qualitative analysis serving as the initial step, providing essential information before moving on to quantitative or other forms of analysis.
There are two main approaches to qualitative analysis:...

Qualitative Analysis

Qualitative Analysis

For solutions containing mixtures of different cations, the identity of each cation can be determined by qualitative analysis. This technique involves a series of selective precipitations with different chemical reagents, each reaction producing a characteristic precipitate for a specific group of cations. Metal ions within a group are further separated by varying the pH, heating the mixture to redissolve a precipitate, or adding other reagents to form complex ions.
For instance, group IV...

Ethics in Research

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.

Humanistic Psychology

Humanistic Psychology

Humanistic psychology emerged in the mid-20th century as a response to the deterministic and pessimistic nature of behaviorism and psychoanalysis. While behaviorism focused on observable behaviors influenced by the environment and psychoanalysis delved into unconscious motivations, both theories suggested that human actions lacked free will. In contrast, humanistic psychology offers a perspective that emphasizes the innate potential for goodness and growth within every individual.
This approach...

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Should Qualitative Researchers in Health and Medicine be Concerned About Replication?

The patient·2026

Same author

Getting fairer over time? Assessing changes in health technology funding processes using the accountability for reasonableness (A4R) framework.

The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care·2026

Same author

Genomic Newborn Screening: Verdict From an Australian Citizens' Jury.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026

Same author

Towards Evidence of Rigour in Empirical Deliberative Democratic Methods: Development and Piloting of the C-JuRI Framework.

Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy·2026

Same author

A critical analysis of the Australian public consultation on childhood vaccine mandate introduction.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026

Same author

Unravelling Public Preferences for the Use of Artificial Intelligence Mobile Health Applications in Australia.

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

Justifying knowledge, justifying method, taking action: epistemologies, methodologies, and methods in qualitative

Stacy M Carter¹, Miles Little

¹The University of Sydney, Australia.

Qualitative Health Research

|November 15, 2007

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This article presents a framework for evaluating qualitative research quality based on epistemology, methodology, and method. Ensuring internal consistency between these elements enhances research rigor and facilitates innovation.

More Related Videos

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Area of Science:

Social Sciences
Research Methodology

Background:

Qualitative research quality evaluation is complex.
Existing frameworks may be insufficient for diverse qualitative approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

To clarify a framework for qualitative research quality evaluation.
To define and interrelate epistemology, methodology, and method.

Main Methods:

Conceptual analysis of epistemology, methodology, and method.
Discussion of their contributions and interrelationships in qualitative research.

Main Results:

Epistemology influences participant-researcher relationships, quality measures, and analysis.
Methodology shapes research design and theory development.
Method reveals epistemic and methodological choices.

Conclusions:

High-quality qualitative research requires attention to and consistency between epistemology, methodology, and method.
This framework transcends standardized checklists, promoting innovation and diversity.