Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Simultaneous Scalp Electroencephalography (EEG), Electromyography (EMG), and Whole-body Segmental Inertial Recording for Multi-modal Neural Decoding
11:25

Simultaneous Scalp Electroencephalography (EEG), Electromyography (EMG), and Whole-body Segmental Inertial Recording for Multi-modal Neural Decoding

Published on: July 26, 2013

Classification of EEG signals using a genetic-based machine learning classifier.

B T Skinner1, H T Nguyen, D K Liu

  • 1Mechatronics and Intelligent Systems Group, University of Technology, Sydney, 2000, Australia. brad.skinner@uts.edu.au

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference
|November 16, 2007
PubMed
Summary

The XCS classifier system effectively identifies human electroencephalogram (EEG) signals for brain-computer interfaces. This research shows high accuracy in classifying noisy EEG data, aiding paralyzed individuals in device control.

Related Concept Videos

Classification of Signals01:30

Classification of Signals

In signal processing, signals are classified based on various characteristics: continuous-time versus discrete-time, periodic versus aperiodic, analog versus digital, and causal versus noncausal. Each category highlights distinct properties crucial for understanding and manipulating signals.
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical trial and real-world evidence of circulating tumor DNA monitoring to predict recurrence in patients with resected colorectal cancer.

ESMO real world data and digital oncology·2026
Same author

Correlation of Doppler indices and umbilical coiling with birthweight and small gestational age prediction in term pregnancies.

Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine·2026
Same author

Integrated treatment-decision algorithms for childhood TB: modelling diagnostic performance and costs.

IJTLD open·2026
Same author

First report of <i>Pratylenchus parazeae</i> (Nematoda: Pratylenchidae) associated with rice in Vietnam.

Helminthologia·2025
Same author

Development of a questionnaire to screen for chronic obstructive respiratory diseases in low- and middle-income countries.

The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease·2025
Same author

[Vascular malformation in head and neck: a clinicopathological analysis of 675 cases].

Zhonghua bing li xue za zhi = Chinese journal of pathology·2025

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Machine Learning
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Human electroencephalogram (EEG) signals are complex and often contain noise and artifacts.
  • Classifying EEG signals is crucial for developing brain-computer interfaces (BCIs).
  • Previous methods for EEG signal classification have limitations in handling noisy data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of the XCS (eXternal Classifier System) genetic-based learning classifier for EEG signal classification.
  • To assess the performance of XCS in classifying noisy, artifact-inclusive EEG signals.
  • To compare XCS performance against non-evolutionary classifier systems.

Main Methods:

  • EEG signals were recorded from three participants performing four distinct mental tasks.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Simultaneous Scalp Electroencephalography (EEG), Electromyography (EMG), and Whole-body Segmental Inertial Recording for Multi-modal Neural Decoding
11:25

Simultaneous Scalp Electroencephalography (EEG), Electromyography (EMG), and Whole-body Segmental Inertial Recording for Multi-modal Neural Decoding

Published on: July 26, 2013

  • Autoregressive (AR) models and Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) were used for feature extraction.
  • The XCS classifier was employed to classify the processed EEG signals.

    • Main Results:

    • XCS achieved a maximum classification accuracy of 99.3% and a best average accuracy of 88.9%.
    • The system demonstrated robust performance in classifying complex EEG data.
    • XCS outperformed four other non-evolutionary classifier systems in this task.

    Conclusions:

    • The XCS classifier system is highly effective for classifying noisy EEG signals.
    • This research supports the feasibility of using EEG signals as an interface for paralyzed individuals.
    • Further research will explore using EEG-based BCIs for controlling assistive devices.