Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Uncertainty Principle04:08

The Uncertainty Principle

Werner Heisenberg considered the limits of how accurately one can measure properties of an electron or other microscopic particles. He determined that there is a fundamental limit to how accurately one can measure both a particle’s position and its momentum simultaneously. The more accurate the measurement of the momentum of a particle is known, the less accurate the position at that time is known and vice versa. This is what is now called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. He mathematically...
The Phase Rule01:20

The Phase Rule

The phase rule describes the relationship between the variance (degrees of freedom), the number of components, and the number of phases in a system at equilibrium.Variance is a concept that denotes the number of independent intensive properties (properties are those that do not depend on the amount of material in the system), such as temperature, pressure, and composition, that can be altered without impacting the number of phases in equilibrium.In a single-component system, such as pure water,...
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lead Control01:24

Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lead Control

Phase-lead controllers are commonly used in various control systems to enhance response speed and stability. Adjusting the brightness on a television screen offers a practical example of phase-lead control. When contrast is enhanced, a phase-lead controller is employed. Mathematically, phase-lead control is identified when the first parameter is smaller than the second.
The design of phase-lead control involves the strategic placement of poles and zeros to balance steady-state error and system...
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lag Control01:21

Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lag Control

Phase-lag controllers are widely used in control systems to improve stability and reduce steady-state errors. A dimmer switch controlling the brightness of a light bulb serves as a practical example of phase-lag control, gradually adjusting the bulb's brightness. Mathematically, phase-lag control or low-pass filtering is represented when the factor 'a' is less than 1.
Phase-lag controllers do not place a pole at zero, but instead influence the steady-state error by amplifying any finite,...
Linear Approximation in Time Domain01:21

Linear Approximation in Time Domain

Nonlinear systems often require sophisticated approaches for accurate modeling and analysis, with state-space representation being particularly effective. This method is especially useful for systems where variables and parameters vary with time or operating conditions, such as in a simple pendulum or a translational mechanical system with nonlinear springs.
For a simple pendulum with a mass evenly distributed along its length and the center of mass located at half the pendulum's length, the...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

No Tradeoff between Coherence and Sub-Poissonianity for Heisenberg-Limited Lasers.

Physical review letters·2023
Same author

Parametric longitudinal coupling between a high-impedance superconducting resonator and a semiconductor quantum dot singlet-triplet spin qubit.

Nature communications·2022
Same author

Coherent spin qubit transport in silicon.

Nature communications·2021
Same author

Optimized quantum sensing with a single electron spin using real-time adaptive measurements.

Nature nanotechnology·2015
Same author

Suppressing qubit dephasing using real-time Hamiltonian estimation.

Nature communications·2014
Same author

Experimental semi-device-independent certification of entangled measurements.

Physical review letters·2014

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Quantum State Engineering of Light with Continuous-wave Optical Parametric Oscillators
09:23

Quantum State Engineering of Light with Continuous-wave Optical Parametric Oscillators

Published on: May 30, 2014

Entanglement-free Heisenberg-limited phase estimation.

B L Higgins1, D W Berry, S D Bartlett

  • 1Centre for Quantum Dynamics, Griffith University, Brisbane 4111, Australia.

Nature
|November 16, 2007
PubMed
Summary

This study demonstrates a new method for precise optical phase measurement, achieving Heisenberg-limited scaling without complex entangled states. This breakthrough significantly reduces the resources needed for quantum-enhanced precision measurements.

More Related Videos

Shaping the Amplitude and Phase of Laser Beams by Using a Phase-only Spatial Light Modulator
08:39

Shaping the Amplitude and Phase of Laser Beams by Using a Phase-only Spatial Light Modulator

Published on: January 28, 2019

A Photonic System for Generating Unconditional Polarization-Entangled Photons Based on Multiple Quantum Interference
07:56

A Photonic System for Generating Unconditional Polarization-Entangled Photons Based on Multiple Quantum Interference

Published on: September 5, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Quantum State Engineering of Light with Continuous-wave Optical Parametric Oscillators
09:23

Quantum State Engineering of Light with Continuous-wave Optical Parametric Oscillators

Published on: May 30, 2014

Shaping the Amplitude and Phase of Laser Beams by Using a Phase-only Spatial Light Modulator
08:39

Shaping the Amplitude and Phase of Laser Beams by Using a Phase-only Spatial Light Modulator

Published on: January 28, 2019

A Photonic System for Generating Unconditional Polarization-Entangled Photons Based on Multiple Quantum Interference
07:56

A Photonic System for Generating Unconditional Polarization-Entangled Photons Based on Multiple Quantum Interference

Published on: September 5, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Quantum metrology
  • Optical phase measurement
  • Precision measurement science

Background:

  • Measurement precision is fundamental to quantitative science, with optical phase measurement crucial for applications like length metrology.
  • Standard quantum limit for phase uncertainty scales as 1/√N, where N is the number of quantum resources.
  • Achieving Heisenberg-limited scaling (1/N) was thought to require difficult-to-generate entangled quantum states.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To experimentally demonstrate a Heisenberg-limited phase estimation procedure.
  • To overcome the limitations of standard quantum measurement schemes.
  • To reduce the complexity associated with achieving quantum-enhanced measurement precision.

Main Methods:

  • Replaced entangled input states with multiple phase shifts on unentangled single-photon states.
  • Generalized Kitaev's phase estimation algorithm using adaptive measurement theory.
  • Experimental demonstration with up to N = 378 quantum resources.

Main Results:

  • Achieved a standard deviation scaling at the Heisenberg limit.
  • Estimated an unknown phase with a variance >10 dB below the standard quantum limit for N=378.
  • This precision would require >4,000 resources using standard interferometry.

Conclusions:

  • Successfully demonstrated a practical Heisenberg-limited phase estimation.
  • Showed that complex entangled states are not necessary for quantum-enhanced precision.
  • Significantly reduced the complexity and resource requirements for quantum-enhanced metrology.