Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Binocular contrast interactions in two-frame motion discrimination.

A Raghunandan1, S B Stevenson

  • 1Michigan College of Optometry, Ferris State University, Big Rapids, Michigan 49307, USA. raghuna@ferris.edu

Perception & Psychophysics
|November 21, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Binocular eye tracking with the Tracking Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope.

Vision research·2015
Same author

Vertical imbalance induced by prism-ballasted soft toric contact lenses fitted unilaterally.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·2008
Same author

A contrast paradox in stereopsis, motion detection, and vernier acuity.

Vision research·2000
Same author

Post-retinal processing of background luminance.

Vision research·2000
Same author

The effect of target size and eccentricity on reflex disparity vergence.

Vision research·1999
Same author

Vergence eye movements elicited by stimuli without corresponding features.

Perception·1998
Same journal

Response organization in selective adaptation to speech sounds.

Perception & psychophysics·2014
Same journal

Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Simple and contingent adaptation effects for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory property detectors and processing place features in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities.

Perception & psychophysics·2008
See all related articles

The contrast paradox in motion detection involves combined signals from both eyes before motion processing. This suggests monocular and binocular contrast gain control mechanisms coexist in visual processing.

Area of Science:

  • Visual Neuroscience
  • Perception
  • Computational Vision

Background:

  • The contrast paradox describes elevated motion detection thresholds with increased contrast.
  • This phenomenon's locus of visual processing (monocular vs. binocular) remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether contrast interactions in two-frame motion detection occur at monocular or binocular processing stages.
  • To determine the site of visual processing responsible for the contrast paradox.

Main Methods:

  • Measured two-frame motion direction discrimination thresholds under various presentation conditions (binocular, dichoptic, interocular).
  • Varied contrast levels within motion frames (matched vs. unmatched contrasts).

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Contrast paradox effects were observed, indicating contrast signals combine before motion computation.
  • Results suggest contrast gain control mechanisms operate at both monocular and binocular levels.

Conclusions:

  • Contrast interactions underlying the paradox integrate visual input from both eyes early in the processing stream.
  • Evidence supports the coexistence of independent or combined monocular and binocular contrast gain control systems.