Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026

13:35
Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
Published on: May 17, 2024
A method to select patients for vertical scar or inverted-T pattern breast reduction
Elizabeth A Dex1, Olle Asplund, Benjamin Ardehali
1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Road, London W8 8RF, UK. luigih@talk21.com
Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery : JPRAS
|November 21, 2007
Summary
Vertical scar breast reduction (VSBR) shows lower complication and revision rates compared to inverted-T breast reductions (ITBR). Careful patient selection based on vertical skin reduction measurement is key to minimizing issues in breast reduction surgery.
Area of Science:
- Plastic Surgery
- Reconstructive Surgery
- Aesthetic Surgery
Background:
- Vertical scar breast reduction (VSBR) is gaining popularity but is associated with significant complication and revision rates.
- Patient selection is crucial for optimizing outcomes in breast reduction procedures.
- Comparing VSBR and inverted-T breast reduction (ITBR) outcomes is essential for surgical decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the complication and revision rates between VSBR and ITBR.
- To identify patient selection criteria that minimize complications in breast reduction surgery.
- To assess the incidence of problematic scarring associated with each surgical technique.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 133 consecutive primary bilateral breast reductions performed by a single consultant (1998-2003).
- Patients were selected for VSBR or ITBR based on a specific vertical height measurement (< 18 cm from inframammary fold to new areola border for VSBR).
- Techniques included nipple-areola complex (NAC) transposition (glandular or superomedial pedicle) and free nipple grafts (FNG).
Main Results:
- VSBR demonstrated a significantly lower overall complication rate (11%) compared to ITBR (23%, P<0.05).
- Revision rates were comparable: 2.4% for VSBR and 3.3% for ITBR.
- VSBR resulted in no problematic scars, whereas ITBR had problematic scars in 16% of cases (P<0.001).
Conclusions:
- VSBR can achieve lower complication and revision rates than ITBR when appropriate patient selection criteria are applied.
- A reproducible measurement of vertical skin reduction (< 18 cm) aids in selecting patients for VSBR, leading to better outcomes.
- Limiting skin reduction to 40-50% of original length is advisable to avoid high revision rates.
