Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Are there circumstances in which phase 2 study results should be practice-changing?
Marcie R Tomblyn1, J Douglas Rizzo
1Dept. of Hematology, Oncology & Transplantation, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St., SE, MMC 480, Minneapolis MN 55455, USA. tombl001@umn.edu
Abstract:
New pharmaceuticals, innovative combinations of approved agents, and novel treatment modalities have resulted in a marked increase in the need for clinical trials. Evidence for treatment efficacy is best derived from large phase 3 randomized, controlled clinical trials. However, phase 3 investigations are lengthy and expensive, and consume patient resources. Furthermore, some diseases and treatment indications are rare, and adequate numbers of patients for a definitive phase 3 trial do not exist. Consequently, it is imperative for clinicians to understand phase 2 trial design, since their interpretation is required to apply the findings in clinical practice appropriately. The complexity of phase 2 studies is explored, including unique designs, possible use of randomization, and other key elements necessary for interpretation of phase 2 trials. Specific examples and application of these concepts are discussed in this review.
Insights
Understanding phase 2 clinical trial design is crucial for clinicians. This review explores phase 2 study complexities, aiding appropriate application of findings in patient care.
Area of Science:
- Clinical research methodology
- Pharmaceutical development
- Medical statistics
Background:
- Increasing need for clinical trials due to new pharmaceuticals and treatments.
- Phase 3 trials are the gold standard for efficacy but are lengthy, costly, and resource-intensive.
- Rare diseases and indications limit patient recruitment for definitive phase 3 trials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To emphasize the importance of understanding phase 2 clinical trial design for clinicians.
- To explore the complexities inherent in phase 2 study designs.
- To provide guidance on interpreting phase 2 trial results for clinical application.
Main Methods:
- Review of phase 2 clinical trial design principles.
- Discussion of unique designs, including randomization possibilities.
- Analysis of key elements critical for interpreting phase 2 study outcomes.
Main Results:
- Phase 2 trials present unique design challenges.
- Randomization can be a component of phase 2 studies.
- Proper interpretation requires understanding specific design elements.
Conclusions:
- Clinicians must comprehend phase 2 trial design to effectively use study findings.
- Phase 2 trials play a vital role when phase 3 is not feasible.
- This review provides essential insights for interpreting phase 2 clinical trial data.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
FDA Approved Drugs: Changes to Approved Drugs
Preclinical Development: Overview
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients