Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Genetic screening: triumphs, problems, and controversies.

M R Natowicz, J S Alper

    Journal of Public Health Policy
    |January 1, 1991
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Late-onset Tay-Sachs disease presenting as a childhood stutter.

    Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·2008
    Same author

    Double outlet right ventricle: aetiologies and associations.

    Journal of medical genetics·2008
    Same author

    Late-onset Tay-Sachs disease: adverse effects of medications and implications for treatment.

    Neurology·2006
    Same author

    Racism: a central problem for the Human Genome Diversity Project.

    Politics and the life sciences : the journal of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences·2003
    Same author

    A seat at the table: membership in federal advisory committees evaluating public policy in genetics.

    American journal of public health·2001
    Same author

    On the philosophical analysis of genetic essentialism. Commentary on: "The use of genetic test information in insurance: the argument from indistinguishability reconsidered".

    Science and engineering ethics·2001
    Same journal

    Trust in transition in the United States: examining health equity priorities, 2021-2024.

    Journal of public health policy·2026
    Same journal

    Bridging borders for eliminating vector-borne diseases: a shared responsibility for the Indian states.

    Journal of public health policy·2026
    Same journal

    Disentangling disparities in children's development.

    Journal of public health policy·2026
    Same journal

    Ethical and public health lessons from Ethiopia's first Marburg virus disease outbreak.

    Journal of public health policy·2026
    Same journal

    Chikungunya virus resurgence in Africa: a call for action.

    Journal of public health policy·2026
    Same journal

    Local governance dynamics in the Colombian health system: an exploratory cross-sectional study among public health sector officials.

    Journal of public health policy·2026
    See all related articles

    Genetic screening programs offer benefits but raise significant ethical, social, and economic questions. Evaluating these implications is crucial for responsible implementation of genetic testing.

    Area of Science:

    • Genetics
    • Bioethics
    • Public Health Policy

    Background:

    • Genetic screening is expanding, necessitating a comprehensive analysis of its implications.
    • Evaluating genetic screening programs requires consideration of scientific, ethical, social, and economic factors.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To characterize different types of genetic screening programs.
    • To discuss the multifaceted issues associated with genetic screening.
    • To examine both successful and controversial screening initiatives.

    Main Methods:

    • Literature review and analysis of existing genetic screening programs.
    • Case studies of successful programs (e.g., phenylketonuria, Tay-Sachs disease).
    • Discussion of controversial or not-yet-implemented programs (e.g., cystic fibrosis, DNA fingerprinting, workplace genetic screening).
    Keywords:
    Genetics and Reproduction

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Successful programs demonstrate the utility of genetic screening in specific contexts.
    • Controversial programs highlight complex ethical and social challenges.
    • The evaluation framework addresses scientific validity, ethical concerns, social impact, and economic feasibility.

    Conclusions:

    • Genetic screening programs present a complex interplay of benefits and challenges.
    • Careful consideration of scientific, ethical, social, and economic factors is essential for program evaluation.
    • Ongoing dialogue and policy development are needed to navigate the evolving landscape of genetic screening.